Literature DB >> 26279848

Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.

Carlos Fernandes1, Rolando Pinho1, Iolanda Ribeiro1, Joana Silva1, Ana Ponte1, João Carvalho1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is able to diagnose, resect and retrieve colonic polyps. Although retrieval of resected polyps is still globally advised, it is not always successful. We aimed to define the risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study assessed 3507 consecutive and non-urgent colonoscopies, performed between September 2011 and December 2012. Colonoscopies were included in our analysis if the diagnosis of at least one polyp was established, and one or more snare polypectomies were performed. Demographic and technical data were collected according to the patient's endoscopy report.
RESULTS: A total of 1109 polyps were analyzed, corresponding to 496 colonoscopies from 483 different patients. We found that 53 (4.8%) of the resected polyps were not retrieved. In a univariate analysis, the factors associated with polyp retrieval failure were: age, polyp size, resection technique, bowel preparation, location and the presence of a previous colorectal surgery (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, a previous colorectal surgery, resection by cold snare, location in the right colon, inadequate bowel preparation and a polyp size up to 5 mm were independently associated with higher polyp retrieval failure (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Different and well-defined factors were associated with polyp retrieval failure. Because bowel preparation was the only modifiable factor identified, a special focus should be given to this topic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy procedures; bowel preparation; colon; colonoscopy; intestinal polyps; polyp retrieval; polypectomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279848      PMCID: PMC4528205          DOI: 10.1177/2050640615572041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  24 in total

1.  A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Lorenzo Fuccio; Mario Bruno; Nico Pagano; Cristiano Spada; Silvia Carrara; Chiara Giordanino; Emanuele Rondonotti; Gabriele Curcio; Pietro Dulbecco; Carlo Fabbri; Domenico Della Casa; Stefania Maiero; Adriana Simone; Federico Iacopini; Giuseppe Feliciangeli; Gianpiero Manes; Antonio Rinaldi; Angelo Zullo; Francesca Rogai; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Charles Kahi; Michael O'Brien; T R Levin; Heiko Pohl; Amit Rastogi; Larry Burgart; Tom Imperiale; Uri Ladabaum; Jonathan Cohen; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Retroflexion in colonoscopy: why? Where? When? How? What value?

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Krishna C Vemulapalli
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vincent K Dik; Leon Mg Moons; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The lost polyp: a guide to retrieval during colonoscopy.

Authors:  J D Waye; B S Lewis; M A Atchison; M Talbott
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea.

Authors:  Yong Woo Chung; Dong Soo Han; Kwang Hyuk Park; Kyoung Oh Kim; Cheol Hee Park; Taeho Hahn; Kyo-Sang Yoo; Sang Hoon Park; Jong Hyeok Kim; Choong Kee Park
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 9.  The effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cillian Clancy; John P Burke; Kah Hoong Chang; J Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  1L NER1006 can improve rates of adequate and high-quality bowel cleansing in the right colon: a post hoc analysis of two randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Jonathan Manning; Juha Halonen; Sandra Jose Cheriyamkunnel; Marco Antonio Álvarez-González
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Takeshi Yamashina; Manabu Fukuhara; Takanori Maruo; Gensho Tanke; Saiko Marui; Ryota Sada; Mio Taki; Yoshiaki Ohara; Azusa Sakamoto; Shinichiro Henmi; Yugo Sawai; Sumio Saito; Norihiro Nishijima; Akihiro Nasu; Hideyuki Komekado; Akira Sekikawa; Masanori Asada; Takehiko Tumura; Ryuichi Kita; Toru Kimura; Yukio Osaki
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.