Literature DB >> 18978506

Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea.

Yong Woo Chung1, Dong Soo Han, Kwang Hyuk Park, Kyoung Oh Kim, Cheol Hee Park, Taeho Hahn, Kyo-Sang Yoo, Sang Hoon Park, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation is important because it can result in missed lesions, cancelled procedures, increased procedural time, and a potential increase in complication rates. This prospective study was designed to look at the quality of colon preparation using polyethylene glycol solution and evaluate potential associations between specific patient characteristics and inadequate bowel preparation.
METHODS: A total of 362 patients who were compliant with preparation instructions were enrolled. All colonoscopic examinations were performed by an experienced endoscopist and the quality of the preparation was graded by the endoscopist (excellent to poor). Patient demographic and medical history information was gathered before the procedure. Possible predictors of inadequate colonic preparation were analyzed using univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: An inadequate bowel preparation was reported in 28.2% of observed colonoscopies. In multivariate regression analysis, age greater than 60 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-7.4], a history of diabetes (OR 8.6, 95% CI 6.3-19.4), a history of appendectomy (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.0-10.5), a history of colorectal resection (OR 7.5, 95% CI 3.4-17.6), and a history of hysterectomy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1-10.4) were independent predictors of an inadequate colon preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study identified several factors that may predict inadequate polyethylene glycol preparation independent of compliance with preparation instructions and procedure starting time. This result may help to identify patients at an increased risk for inadequate bowel preparation for whom alternative preparation protocols would be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18978506     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181662442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  65 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carlos Fernandes; Rolando Pinho; Iolanda Ribeiro; Joana Silva; Ana Ponte; João Carvalho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing.

Authors:  Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han; Yil Sik Hyun; Joong Ho Bae; Hye Sun Park; Tae Yeob Kim; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Optimal Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient.

Authors:  Samuel B Ho; Rita Hovsepians; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Predictive factors for inadequate colon preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  R-W Cheng; Y-C Chiu; K-L Wu; C K Rayner; W-C Tai; M-L Hu; Y-P Chou; S-K Chuah; C-M Liang; L-S Lu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Patricia Wren; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Grace H Elta; Stephanie Foster; Sheryl Korsnes; Brittany Graustein; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Poly(8-aminoguanylic acid): formation of ordered self-structures and interaction with poly(cytidylic acid).

Authors:  M Hattori; J Frazier; H T Miles
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-11-18       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shail M Govani; Eric E Elliott; Stacy B Menees; Stephanie L Judd; Sameer D Saini; Constantinos P Anastassiades; Annette L Urganus; Suzanna J Boyce; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-16

9.  Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center.

Authors:  Anoop Appannagari; Shikha Mangla; Chuanhong Liao; K Gautham Reddy; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.