Literature DB >> 21353837

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Douglas K Rex, Charles Kahi, Michael O'Brien, T R Levin, Heiko Pohl, Amit Rastogi, Larry Burgart, Tom Imperiale, Uri Ladabaum, Jonathan Cohen, David A Lieberman.   

Abstract

The PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations) initiative is an ASGE program whose objectives are to identify important clinical questions related to endoscopy and to establish a priori diagnostic and/or therapeutic thresholds for endoscopic technologies designed to resolve these clinical questions. Additionally, PIVIs may also outline the data and or the research study design required for proving an established threshold is met. Once endoscopic technologies meet an established PIVI threshold, those technologies are appropriate to incorporate into clinical practice presuming the appropriate training in that endoscopic technology has been achieved. The ASGE encourages and supports the appropriate use of technologies that meet its established PIVI thresholds. The PIVI initiative was developed primarily to direct endoscopic technology development toward resolving important clinical issues in endoscopy. The PIVI initiative is also designed to minimize the possibility that potentially valuable innovations are prematurely abandoned due to lack of utilization and to avoid widespread use of an endoscopic technology before clinical studies documenting their effectiveness have been performed. The following document, or PIVI, is one of a series of statements defining the diagnostic or therapeutic threshold that must be met for a technique or device to become considered appropriate for incorporation into clinical practice. It is also meant to serve as a guide for researchers or those seeking to develop technologies that are designed to improve digestive health outcomes. An ad hoc committee under the auspices of the existing ASGE Technology and Standards of Practice Committees Chairs develops PIVIs. An expert in the subject area chairs the PIVI, with additional committee members chosen for their individual expertise. In preparing this document, evidence-based methodology was employed, using a MEDLINE and PubMed literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic. PIVIs are ultimately submitted to the ASGE Governing Board for approval, as is done for all Technology and Standards of Practice documents. This document is provided solely for educational and informational purposes and to support incorporating these endoscopic technologies into clinical practice. It should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353837     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  148 in total

1.  Risks and potential cost savings of not sending diminutive polyps for histologic examination.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-02

2.  Prospective evaluation of a simplified narrowband imaging scoring system for a differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aihara; Nitin Kumar; Marvin Ryou; Robert Burakoff; Marwan Abou Gergi; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carlos Fernandes; Rolando Pinho; Iolanda Ribeiro; Joana Silva; Ana Ponte; João Carvalho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Management and risk factors for incomplete resection associated with jumbo forceps polypectomy for diminutive colorectal polyps: a single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shinji Nagata; Kenjiro Shigita; Yutaro Ogawa; Hirosato Tamari; Taiki Aoyama; Akira Fukumoto; Shinichi Mukai; Mayumi Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Molecular imaging in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Raja Atreya; Martin Goetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  The Resect-and-Discard Strategy for Management of Small and Diminutive Colonic Polyps.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-05

Review 7.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 8.  Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.

Authors:  Vijeta Pamudurthy; Nayna Lodhia; Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-12-18

9.  Spatially resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy endoscopic sensing with custom Si photodetectors.

Authors:  Ben Lariviere; Katherine S Garman; N Lynn Ferguson; Deborah A Fisher; Nan M Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.