Literature DB >> 8247072

Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

S J Winawer1, A G Zauber, M N Ho, M J O'Brien, L S Gottlieb, S S Sternberg, J D Waye, M Schapiro, J H Bond, J F Panish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current practice of removing adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum is based on the belief that this will prevent colorectal cancer. To address the hypothesis that colonoscopic polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer, we analyzed the results of the National Polyp Study with reference to other published results.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 1418 patients who had a complete colonoscopy during which one or more adenomas of the colon or rectum were removed. The patients subsequently underwent periodic colonoscopy during an average follow-up of 5.9 years, and the incidence of colorectal cancer was ascertained. The incidence rate of colorectal cancer was compared with that in three reference groups, including two cohorts in which colonic polyps were not removed and one general-population registry, after adjustment for sex, age, and polyp size.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of the patients were followed clinically for a total of 8401 person-years, and 80 percent returned for one or more of their scheduled colonoscopies. Five asymptomatic early-stage colorectal cancers (malignant polyps) were detected by colonoscopy (three at three years, one at six years, and one at seven years). No symptomatic cancers were detected. The numbers of colorectal cancers expected on the basis of the rates in the three reference groups were 48.3, 43.4, and 20.7, for reductions in the incidence of colorectal cancer of 90, 88, and 76 percent, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic polypectomy resulted in a lower-than-expected incidence of colorectal cancer. These results support the view that colorectal adenomas progress to adenocarcinomas, as well as the current practice of searching for and removing adenomatous polyps to prevent colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8247072     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1088 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers as surrogates for cancer development.

Authors:  E Hawk; J L Viner; J A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Screening colonoscopy: is it time?

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The diagnostic and therapeutic roles of colonoscopy: a review.

Authors:  E H Huang; J M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colorectal cancer screening: now is the time.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Nutritional strategies in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J B Mason; Y i Kim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-08

Review 7.  Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J M A Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Antagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D A L Macafee; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Risk factors for delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Narut Prasitlumkum; Buravej Assavapongpaiboon; Sakolwan Suchartlikitwong; Anawin Sanguankeo; Sikarin Upala
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Helicobacter pylori infection increases the risk of colorectal adenomas: cross-sectional study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; Seung Min Lee; Jeong Han Kim; Tae Yoon Lee; Jeong Hwan Kim; Won Hyeok Choe; Sun-Young Lee; Young Koog Cheon; In Kyung Sung; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.