Literature DB >> 24605019

Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.

Vincent K Dik1, Leon Mg Moons1, Peter D Siersema1.   

Abstract

Up to a quarter of polyps and adenomas are missed during colonoscopy due to poor visualization behind folds and the inner curves of flexures, and the presence of flat lesions that are difficult to detect. These numbers may however be conservative because they mainly come from back-to-back studies performed with standard colonoscopes, which are unable to visualize the entire mucosal surface. In the past several years, new endoscopic techniques have been introduced to improve the detection of polyps and adenomas. The introduction of high definition colonoscopes and visual image enhancement technologies have been suggested to lead to better recognition of flat and small lesions, but the absolute increase in diagnostic yield seems limited. Cap assisted colonoscopy and water-exchange colonoscopy are methods to facilitate cecal intubation and increase patients comfort, but show only a marginal or no benefit on polyp and adenoma detection. Retroflexion is routinely used in the rectum for the inspection of the dentate line, but withdrawal in retroflexion in the colon is in general not recommended due to the risk of perforation. In contrast, colonoscopy with the Third-Eye Retroscope® may result in considerable lower miss rates compared to standard colonoscopy, but this technique is not practical in case of polypectomy and is more time consuming. The recently introduced Full Spectrum Endoscopy™ colonoscopes maintains the technical capabilities of standard colonoscopes and provides a much wider view of 330 degrees compared to the 170 degrees with standard colonoscopes. Remarkable lower adenoma miss rates with this new technique were recently demonstrated in the first randomized study. Nonetheless, more studies are required to determine the exact additional diagnostic yield in clinical practice. Optimizing the efficacy of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance requires high definition colonoscopes with improved virtual chromoendoscopy technology that visualize the whole colon mucosa while maintaining optimal washing, suction and therapeutic capabilities, and keeping the procedural time as low and patient discomfort as optimal as possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection; Colonoscopy; Endoscopic innovations; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Polyp detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24605019      PMCID: PMC3942825          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  85 in total

1.  Computer-based classification of small colorectal polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification.

Authors:  Sebastian Gross; Christian Trautwein; Alexander Behrens; Ron Winograd; Stephan Palm; Holger H Lutz; Ramin Schirin-Sokhan; Hartmut Hecker; Til Aach; Jens J W Tischendorf
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Limited water infusion decreases pain during minimally sedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Hwai-Jeng Lin; Kuo-Chih Tseng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A new method for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  Accuracy of in vivo optical diagnosis of colon polyp histology by narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals.

Authors:  Neil Gupta; Ajay Bansal; Deepthi Rao; Dayna S Early; Sreenivasa Jonnalagadda; Steven A Edmundowicz; Prateek Sharma; Amit Rastogi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Lynne D Do; Rodelei M Siao-Salera; Catherine Ngo; Dhavan A Parikh; Surinder K Mann; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01

7.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G Tribonias; A Theodoropoulou; K Konstantinidis; E Vardas; K Karmiris; N Chroniaris; G Chlouverakis; G A Paspatis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  Matthew Harrison; Navjot Singh; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.

Authors:  J E East; M Stavrindis; S Thomas-Gibson; T Guenther; P P Tekkis; B P Saunders
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Siddharth Singh; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; David A Ahlquist; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carlos Fernandes; Rolando Pinho; Iolanda Ribeiro; Joana Silva; Ana Ponte; João Carvalho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Tumor recognition of peanut agglutinin-immobilized fluorescent nanospheres in biopsied human tissues.

Authors:  Hironori Kumagai; Kosuke Yamada; Kanako Nakai; Tokio Kitamura; Kohta Mohri; Masami Ukawa; Takumi Tomono; Takaaki Eguchi; Testuya Yoshizaki; Takumi Fukuchi; Takuya Yoshino; Minoru Matsuura; Etsuo Tobita; Wellington Pham; Hiroshi Nakase; Shinji Sakuma
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.571

5.  Number of significant polyps detected per six-minute withdrawal time at colonoscopy (SP6): a new measure of colonoscopy efficiency and quality.

Authors:  Rajaratnam Rameshshanker; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-24

6.  Enabling precision digestive surgery with fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Michele Diana
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 7.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

8.  Multimodal Video Colonoscope for Targeted Wide-Field Detection of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Bishnu P Joshi; Asha Pant; Xiyu Duan; Anoop Prabhu; Erik J Wamsteker; Richard S Kwon; Grace H Elta; Scott R Owens; Henry D Appelman; Thomas D Wang; D Kim Turgeon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

Review 10.  The Effect of Right Colon Retroflexion on Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonah Cohen; Douglas Grunwald; Laurie B Grossberg; Mandeep S Sawhney
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.