Literature DB >> 28507745

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Michal F Kaminski1,2,3,4, Siwan Thomas-Gibson5, Marek Bugajski1,2, Michael Bretthauer3,4, Colin J Rees6, Evelien Dekker7, Geir Hoff3,8,9, Rodrigo Jover10, Stepan Suchanek11, Monika Ferlitsch12, John Anderson13, Thomas Roesch14, Rolf Hultcranz15, Istvan Racz16, Ernst J Kuipers17, Kjetil Garborg3, James E East18, Maciej Rupinski1,2, Birgitte Seip19, Cathy Bennett20, Carlo Senore21, Silvia Minozzi21, Raf Bisschops22, Dirk Domagk23, Roland Valori24, Cristiano Spada25, Cesare Hassan26, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro27,28, Matthew D Rutter29,30.   

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; patient safety; performance measures; quality; quality indicators

Year:  2017        PMID: 28507745      PMCID: PMC5415221          DOI: 10.1177/2050640617700014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  129 in total

1.  Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Said Din; Alex J Ball; Eleanor Taylor; Matthew Rutter; Stuart A Riley; Shawinder Johal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Compliance and Satisfaction with Long-Term Surveillance in Finnish HNPCC Families.

Authors:  Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Matti Kairaluoma; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Terminal ileal intubation and biopsy in routine colonoscopy practice.

Authors:  Laura J Neilson; Roisin Bevan; Simon Panter; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Volker Moritz; Michael Bretthauer; Øyvind Holme; Morten Wang Fagerland; Magnus Løberg; Tom Glomsaker; Thomas de Lange; Birgitte Seip; Per Sandvei; Geir Hoff
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Patients' perception of colonoscopy: patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome experience the largest burden.

Authors:  Maaike J Denters; Marthe Schreuder; Annekatrien C T M Depla; Rosalie C Mallant-Hent; Mariette C A van Kouwen; Marije Deutekom; Patrick M Bossuyt; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.566

9.  Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Judith R Logan; Michael Zurfluh; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study.

Authors:  Else-Mariëtte B van Heijningen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ewout W Steyerberg; S Lucas Goede; Evelien Dekker; Wilco Lesterhuis; Frank ter Borg; Juda Vecht; Pieter Spoelstra; Leopold Engels; Clemens J M Bolwerk; Robin Timmer; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra; Harry J de Koning; Ernst J Kuipers; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  37 in total

1.  Terminal ileum ileoscopy and histology in patients undergoing high-definition colonoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for chronic nonbloody diarrhea: A prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Edoardo Borsotti; Brigida Barberio; Renata D'Incà; Gianluca Bonitta; Flaminia Cavallaro; Luca Pastorelli; Emanuele Rondonotti; Leonardo Samperi; Helmut Neumann; Chiara Viganò; Maurizio Vecchi; Gian Eugenio Tontini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Impact of photodocumentation of caecal intubation on colonoscopy outcomes.

Authors:  Brendan Moran; Rishabh Sehgal; Neil O'Morain; Eoin Slattery; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Post-polypectomy recurrence: Low detector or high-risk polyp?

Authors:  C Hassan; A Repici; D K Rex
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Adoption of colonoscopy quality measures across Europe: the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group experience.

Authors:  Jürgen F Riemann; Anurag Agrawal; Pedro Amaro; Lene Brink; Wolfgang Fischbach; Mattias Hünger; Rodrigo Jover; Akiko Ono; Ervin Toth; Cristiano Spada
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Crohn's disease.

Authors:  G Pellino; D S Keller; G M Sampietro; I Angriman; M Carvello; V Celentano; F Colombo; F Di Candido; S Laureti; G Luglio; G Poggioli; M Rottoli; S Scaringi; G Sciaudone; G Sica; L Sofo; S Leone; S Danese; A Spinelli; G Delaini; F Selvaggi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Editorial: The Name Game: Circumventing Quality Metrics by Categorizing Incomplete Colonoscopy as Sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaz; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Colorectal cancer surveillance in Portuguese families with lynch syndrome: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rita Vale Rodrigues; Isabel Claro; Pedro Lage; Isadora Rosa; Sara Ferreira; João Pereira da Silva; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Impact of high-volume, intermediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonoscopy quality and patient satisfaction: An observational study.

Authors:  E Waldmann; D Penz; B Majcher; J Zagata; H Šinkovec; G Heinze; A Dokladanska; A Szymanska; M Trauner; A Ferlitsch; M Ferlitsch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 9.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

10.  Monitoring of colonoscopy quality indicators in an academic endoscopy facility reveals adherence to international recommendations.

Authors:  Stefanos Karamaroudis; Aliki Stamou; Stamatia C Vorri; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Vasilios Papadopoulos; Georgios Tziatzios; Aikaterini Karagouni; Panagiota Katsouli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.