Literature DB >> 26264731

A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.

Yoshihiro Haga1,2, Koichi Chida3,4, Yohei Inaba1,5, Yuji Kaga2, Taiichiro Meguro2, Masayuki Zuguchi1.   

Abstract

As the use of diagnostic X-ray equipment with flat panel detectors (FPDs) has increased, so has the importance of proper management of FPD systems. To ensure quality control (QC) of FPD system, an easy method for evaluating FPD imaging performance for both stationary and moving objects is required. Until now, simple rotatable QC phantoms have not been available for the easy evaluation of the performance (spatial resolution and dynamic range) of FPD in imaging moving objects. We developed a QC phantom for this purpose. It consists of three thicknesses of copper and a rotatable test pattern of piano wires of various diameters. Initial tests confirmed its stable performance. Our moving phantom is very useful for QC of FPD images of moving objects because it enables visual evaluation of image performance (spatial resolution and dynamic range) easily.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Flat panel detector (FPD); Fluoroscopy; Moving phantom; Quality control (QC)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26264731      PMCID: PMC4722028          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9816-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

Review 1.  Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 2, review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient.

Authors:  T R Koenig; F A Mettler; L K Wagner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A new tool for benchmarking cardiovascular fluoroscopes.

Authors:  S Balter
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Thomas C Gerber; Stephen Balter; David J Brenner; J Jeffrey Carr; Manuel D Cerqueira; Jersey Chen; Andrew J Einstein; Harlan M Krumholz; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Cynthia H McCollough; James K Min; Richard L Morin; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Khurram Nasir; Rita F Redberg; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  A quality-control phantom for digitization of radiographs.

Authors:  E J Halpern; P D Esser; E L Nickoloff; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Haruo Saito; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi; Masahiro Kohzuki; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Novel Dosimeter Using a Nontoxic Phosphor for Real-Time Monitoring of Patient Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Masaaki Nakamura; Koichi Chida; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results.

Authors:  Virginia Tsapaki; Nada A Ahmed; Jamila Salem AlSuwaidi; Adnan Beganovic; Abdelkader Benider; Latifa BenOmrane; Rada Borisova; Sotirios Economides; Leila El-Nachef; Dario Faj; Ashot Hovhannesyan; Mohammad Hassan Kharita; Nadia Khelassi-Toutaoui; Nisakorn Manatrakul; Ilkhom Mirsaidov; Mohamed Shaaban; Ion Ursulean; Jeska Sidika Wambani; Areesha Zaman; Julius Ziliukas; Dejan Zontar; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Radiation dose of cardiac IVR x-ray systems: a comparison of present and past.

Authors:  Yohei Inaba; Koichi Chida; Ryota Kobayashi; Yoshihiro Haga; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  Acta Cardiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Haruo Saito; Hiroki Otani; Masahiro Kohzuki; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada; Kunio Shirato; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Yutaka Kagaya; Haruo Saito; Yoshihiro Takai; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada; Masahiro Kohzuki; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.

Authors:  Yohei Inaba; Koichi Chida; Ryota Kobayashi; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.