Literature DB >> 25366837

Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Reza Fazel, Thomas C Gerber, Stephen Balter, David J Brenner, J Jeffrey Carr, Manuel D Cerqueira, Jersey Chen, Andrew J Einstein, Harlan M Krumholz, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Cynthia H McCollough, James K Min, Richard L Morin, Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Khurram Nasir, Rita F Redberg, Leslee J Shaw.   

Abstract

Education, justification, and optimization are the cornerstones to enhancing the radiation safety of medical imaging. Education regarding the benefits and risks of imaging and the principles of radiation safety is required for all clinicians in order for them to be able to use imaging optimally. Empowering patients with knowledge of the benefits and risks of imaging will facilitate their meaningful participation in decisions related to their health care, which is necessary to achieve patient-centered care. Limiting the use of imaging to appropriate clinical indications can ensure that the benefits of imaging outweigh any potential risks. Finally, the continually expanding repertoire of techniques that allow high-quality imaging with lower radiation exposure should be used when available to achieve safer imaging. The implementation of these strategies in practice is necessary to achieve high-quality, patient-centered imaging and will require a shared effort and investment by all stakeholders, including physicians, patients, national scientific and educational organizations, politicians, and industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHA Scientific Statements; cardiac imaging techniques; radiation dosage; radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25366837     DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  39 in total

1.  How to approach an inappropriately ordered myocardial perfusion stress study: A case-based ethics discussion.

Authors:  Ajay V Srivastava; Andrew Kontak; Leslee J Shaw; Neal W Dickert; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Jamshid Shirani; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Haga; Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Yuji Kaga; Taiichiro Meguro; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Minimizing the radiation dose of CT attenuation correction while improving image quality: The case for innovation.

Authors:  James A Case
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Return of dual-isotope SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging? Not so fast….

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The significance of post-stress decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients undergoing regadenoson stress gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Javier Gomez; Yasmeen Golzar; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Adebayo Olusanya; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  It's about time we think about lowering radiation dose in obese patients too.

Authors:  Daniel A Kim; Mary Beth Farrell; Scott D Jerome
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia in women.

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.