Literature DB >> 29846880

The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.

Fred H Menko1, Jacqueline A Ter Stege2, Lizet E van der Kolk3, Kiki N Jeanson3, Winnie Schats4, Daoud Ait Moha3, Eveline M A Bleiker2.   

Abstract

Following the identification in a proband of a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) or a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation in Lynch syndrome (LS) he or she will be asked to inform at-risk family members about the option for presymptomatic DNA testing. However, in clinical practice multiple factors may complicate the process of information sharing. We critically evaluated studies on the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in both syndromes. A search of relevant MeSH terms and key words in PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO yielded 795 articles published between 2001 and 2017. Thirty of these publications included outcome measures relevant for the current study. Based on information provided by the proband (15 studies) the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing ranged from 15 to 57% in HBOC, while one study in LS kindreds reported an uptake of 70%. Based on information provided by genetics centres (the remaining 15 studies) the uptake ranged from 21 to 44% in HBOC and from 41 to 94% in LS. However, when genetics centres contacted relatives directly a substantial number of additional family members could be tested. Proband-mediated provision of information to at-risk relatives is a standard procedure in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome. However, the resulting uptake of presymptomatic testing is disappointing-an issue that is now urgent due to the increased use of genetic testing in clinical oncology. We propose that additional strategies should be introduced including the geneticist directly contacting relatives. The outcomes of these strategies should be carefully monitored and evaluated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cascade screening; Direct contact; Duty to warn; Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer; Informing family members; Lynch syndrome; Presymptomatic genetic testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29846880     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  73 in total

1.  The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation.

Authors:  E Sermijn; G Goelen; E Teugels; L Kaufman; M Bonduelle; B Neyns; B Poppe; A De Paepe; J De Grève
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Authors:  Bobbi McGivern; Jessica Everett; Geoffrey G Yager; Robert C Baumiller; Amanda Hafertepen; Howard M Saal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 3.  Inherited susceptibility to common cancers.

Authors:  William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Colorectal cancer: Cascade genetic testing in Lynch syndrome: room for improvement.

Authors:  Kory Jasperson
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.

Authors:  Meaghann Weaver
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Testing participation in BRCA1/2-positive families: initiator role of index cases.

Authors:  Cécile Blandy; Françoise Chabal; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2003

7.  Genetic diseases and information to relatives: practical and ethical issues for professionals after introduction of a legal framework in France.

Authors:  Diane d'Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Quantifying family dissemination and identifying barriers to communication of risk information in Australian BRCA families.

Authors:  Emma Healey; Natalie Taylor; Sian Greening; Claire E Wakefield; Linda Warwick; Rachel Williams; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Uptake of genetic testing by the children of Lynch syndrome variant carriers across three generations.

Authors:  Toni T Seppälä; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  The impact of an interventional counselling procedure in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation: efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Erica Sermijn; Liesbeth Delesie; Ellen Deschepper; Ingrid Pauwels; Maryse Bonduelle; Erik Teugels; Jacques De Grève
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  32 in total

1.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vivienne K Beard; Angela C Bedard; Jennifer Nuk; Petra W C Lee; Quan Hong; James E J Bedard; Sophie Sun; Kasmintan A Schrader
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-10-19

Review 2.  Breast Cancer and Multiple Primary Malignant Tumors: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro De Luca; Federico Frusone; Massimo Vergine; Rosario Cocchiara; Giuseppe La Torre; Laura Ballesio; Massimo Monti; Maria Ida Amabile
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Relationship between genetic knowledge and familial communication of CRC risk and intent to communicate CRCP genetic information: insights from FamilyTalk eMERGE III.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Deborah J Bowen; Brian H Shirts; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hendrika W Meischke; Eric B Larson; James D Ralston; Kathleen Leppig; David R Crosslin; David Veenstra; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Recommendation and Acceptance of Counselling for Familial Cancer Risk in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Cases.

Authors:  Karin Kast; Julia Häfner; Evelin Schröck; Arne Jahn; Carmen Werner; Cornelia Meisel; Pauline Wimberger
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.268

5.  Incomplete Penetrance of Population-Based Genetic Screening Results in Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Gai Elhanan; Daniel Kiser; Iva Neveux; Shaun Dabe; Alexandre Bolze; William J Metcalf; James T Lu; Joseph J Grzymski
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Examining the uptake of predictive BRCA testing in the UK; findings and implications.

Authors:  Karen Lynn Greenhalgh; Munir Pirmohamed; Antony P Martin; Jennifer Downing; Brendan Collins; Brian Godman; Ana Alfirevic
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Uptake of cancer risk management strategies among women who undergo cascade genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Grace Tran; Brooke Levin; Kristin D Mattie; Brian Dreyer; Robert J Volk; Generosa Grana; Banu K Arun; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Chris Stinton; Mary Jordan; Hannah Fraser; Peter Auguste; Rachel Court; Lena Al-Khudairy; Jason Madan; Dimitris Grammatopoulos; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study.

Authors:  Selina Goodman; Heather Skirton; Leigh Jackson; Ray B Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Patient ethnicity and cascade genetic testing: a descriptive study of a publicly funded hereditary cancer program.

Authors:  Eryn F Braley; Angela C Bedard; Sophie Sun; Kasmintan A Schrader; Jennifer Nuk; Quan Hong; James E J Bedard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.