Literature DB >> 16468088

The importance of written information packages in support of case-finding within families at risk for inherited high cholesterol.

Hélène W P van den Nieuwenhoff1, Ilse Mesters, Joyce J T M Nellissen, Anton F Stalenhoef, Nanne K de Vries.   

Abstract

Inherited High Cholesterol is treatable, but highly underdiagnosed. To detect undiagnosed blood relatives at a presymptomatic stage, in the Netherlands written information packages are available to facilitate family communication. To investigate the role of those packages in the detection of carriers, we conducted a qualitative evaluation (plus-minus method combined with semistructured interviews with index patients and relatives). Our data suggest that interviewees approved the family approach for finding carriers, although reluctantly. The packages aided family disclosure by reducing hesitation. However, index patients only informed first-degree relatives and generally communicated the risk only once. This may be due to the cultural context and a limited understanding of genetics. For relatives the packages served as a cue to action and as a legitimation to gain access to a diagnostic cholesterol test. Despite the value of these written materials, they should not be used as the only communication between index patient and relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16468088     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9001-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy.

Authors:  M B Daly; A Barsevick; S M Miller; R Buckman; J Costalas; S Montgomery; R Bingler
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-10

Review 3.  Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel J Rader; Jonathan Cohen; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Genetic information leaflets: influencing attitudes towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Elena di Lorenzo; Ruth Lane; Kevin Armstrong; Saskia Sanderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known.

Authors:  Brenda J Wilson; Karen Forrest; Edwin R van Teijlingen; Lorna McKee; Neva Haites; Eric Matthews; Sheila A Simpson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

6.  Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Eric Legius
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Safety and efficacy of long-term statin-fibrate combinations in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  V G Athyros; A A Papageorgiou; H A Hatzikonstandinou; T P Didangelos; M V Carina; D F Kranitsas; A G Kontopoulos
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Informing one's family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study.

Authors:  Ilse Mesters; Marlein Ausems; Sophie Eichhorn; Hans Vasen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Written patient information: a review of the literature.

Authors:  V A Arthur
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  High "population attributable fraction" for coronary heart disease mortality among relatives in monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Melissa A Austin; Ron L Zimmern; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Patients' experiences and views of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Nick Jenkins; Margaret Douglas; Simon Walker; Robert Finnie; Mary Porteous; Julia Lawton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-09-02

3.  Do research participants share genomic screening results with family members?

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Hila Milo Rasouly; Tania Vasquez-Loarte; Akilan M Saami; Robyn Weiss; Sonja I Ziniel; Paul S Appelbaum; Ellen Wright Clayton; Kurt D Christensen; David Fasel; Robert C Green; Heather S Hain; Margaret Harr; Christin Hoell; Iftikhar J Kullo; Kathleen A Leppig; Melanie F Myers; Joel E Pacyna; Emma F Perez; Cynthia A Prows; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Richard R Sharp; Maureen E Smith; Georgia L Wiesner; Janet L Williams; Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Ali G Gharavi; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.717

4.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  Determinants of participation in colonoscopic screening by siblings of colorectal cancer patients in France.

Authors:  Myriam Taouqi; Isabelle Ingrand; Michel Beauchant; Virginie Migeot; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Barriers and motivators for referral of patients with suspected lynch syndrome to cancer genetic services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Lisa J Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-02-18

7.  Health care providers' perspective on using family history in the prevention of type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study including different disciplines.

Authors:  Suzanne C M van Esch; Wieke H Heideman; Wilmy Cleijne; Martina C Cornel; Frank J Snoek
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population.

Authors:  Lieke Marleen van den Heuvel; Daphne Stemkens; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Floor Willeboordse; Imke Christiaans
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.