Literature DB >> 26242546

[Augmentation techniques on the proximal femur].

C Neuerburg1, M Gosch, M Blauth, W Böcker, C Kammerlander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the demographic change fractures of the proximal femur are an increasing major healthcare problem and are associated with the highest mortality among frailty fractures.
OBJECTIVES: These mainly osteoporosis-associated fractures of the hip often represent a surgical challenge and the outcome has a decisive influence on the preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. Augmentation techniques could improve the stability of osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures.
METHODS: Cement augmentation of proximal femoral nailing (PFNA) for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures is the most commonly used and standardized method of augmentation for these fractures by which a safer condition for immediate full weight bearing and mobilization can be achieved.
RESULTS: In biomechanical and clinical studies good fracture healing was shown and there was no evidence of cement-associated complications in augmented PFNA nailing. In the majority of patients the mobility level prior to trauma could be achieved.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the optimal surgical treatment, secondary prevention such as osteoporosis management to avoid further fractures is crucial in the treatment of these patients. This article is based on the current literature and provides an overview of the possible applications of cement augmentation for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. In addition the surgical approach as well as previous scientific data on an established osteosynthesis using cement-augmented PFNA for the treatment of pertrochanteric frailty fractures are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26242546     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-015-0051-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  29 in total

Review 1.  Delirium in older persons.

Authors:  Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis--Bone Evaluation Study (BEST): an analysis of routine health insurance data.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Silvia Klein; Holger Gothe; Bertram Häussler; Thomas Kless; Torsten Schmidt; Thomas Steinle; Frank Verheyen; Roland Linder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Daniel Iglesias; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Implications for fracture healing of current and new osteoporosis treatments: an ESCEO consensus paper.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; J-M Féron; J Kanis; S Papapoulos; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; W Dere; B Mitlak; Y Tsouderos; S Boonen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  P von der Linden; A Gisep; V Boner; M Windolf; A Appelt; N Suhm
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Christian Kammerlander; Markus Gosch; Ursula Kammerlander-Knauer; Thomas J Luger; Michael Blauth; Tobias Roth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Long-term results of the augmented PFNA: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  C Kammerlander; H Doshi; F Gebhard; A Scola; C Meier; W Linhart; M Garcia-Alonso; J Nistal; M Blauth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.

Authors:  D A Eekman; S H van Helden; A M Huisman; H J J Verhaar; I E M Bultink; P P Geusens; P Lips; W F Lems
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Outcomes of osteoporotic trochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Vinay Gupta; Navdeep Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Does bone compaction around the helical blade of a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) decrease the risk of cut-out?: A subject-specific computational study.

Authors:  J M Goffin; P Pankaj; A H R W Simpson; R Seil; T G Gerich
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe?

Authors:  Konrad Schuetze; S Ehinger; A Eickhoff; C Dehner; F Gebhard; P H Richter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Trochanteric fragility fractures : Treatment using the cement-augmented proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  C Neuerburg; S Mehaffey; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [72/f-Stumbling fall onto the hips : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 42].

Authors:  Johannes Gleich; Carl Neuerburg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.