C Neuerburg1, S Mehaffey2, M Gosch3, W Böcker2, M Blauth4, C Kammerlander2,4. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery, Munich University, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany. carl.neuerburg@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Department of Trauma Surgery, Munich University, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Medicine 2/Geriatrics, Paracellsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, 90419, Nuremberg, Germany. 4. Department of Trauma Surgery and Sportsmedicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Use of standardized cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) for the treatment of trochanteric fragility fractures, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality, to achieve safer conditions for immediate full weight-bearing and mobilization, thus, improving preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. INDICATIONS: Trochanteric fragility fractures (type 31-A1-3). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Ipsilateral arthritis of the hip, leakage of contrast agent into the hip joint, femoral neck fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Reduction of the fracture on a fracture table if possible, or minimally invasive open reduction of the proximal femur, i. e., using collinear forceps if necessary. Positioning of guidewires for adjustment of the PFNA and the spiral blade, respectively. Exclusion of leakage of contrast agent and subsequent injection of TRAUMACEM™ V(+) into the femoral head-neck fragment via a trauma needle kit introduced into the spiral blade. Dynamic or static locking of the PFNA at the diaphyseal level. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immediate mobilization of the patients with full weight-bearing and secondary prevention, such as osteoporosis management is necessary to avoid further fractures in the treatment of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients older than 65 years underwent the procedure. Of the 72 patients available for follow-up (average age 85.3 years), all fractures healed after an average of 15.3 months. No complications related with cement augmentation were observed. Approximately 60 % of patients achieved the mobility level prior to trauma.
OBJECTIVE: Use of standardized cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) for the treatment of trochanteric fragility fractures, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality, to achieve safer conditions for immediate full weight-bearing and mobilization, thus, improving preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. INDICATIONS: Trochanteric fragility fractures (type 31-A1-3). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Ipsilateral arthritis of the hip, leakage of contrast agent into the hip joint, femoral neck fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Reduction of the fracture on a fracture table if possible, or minimally invasive open reduction of the proximal femur, i. e., using collinear forceps if necessary. Positioning of guidewires for adjustment of the PFNA and the spiral blade, respectively. Exclusion of leakage of contrast agent and subsequent injection of TRAUMACEM™ V(+) into the femoral head-neck fragment via a trauma needle kit introduced into the spiral blade. Dynamic or static locking of the PFNA at the diaphyseal level. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immediate mobilization of the patients with full weight-bearing and secondary prevention, such as osteoporosis management is necessary to avoid further fractures in the treatment of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients older than 65 years underwent the procedure. Of the 72 patients available for follow-up (average age 85.3 years), all fractures healed after an average of 15.3 months. No complications related with cement augmentation were observed. Approximately 60 % of patients achieved the mobility level prior to trauma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone fractures; Elderly; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Weight-bearing
Authors: Anders Prestmo; Gunhild Hagen; Olav Sletvold; Jorunn L Helbostad; Pernille Thingstad; Kristin Taraldsen; Stian Lydersen; Vidar Halsteinli; Turi Saltnes; Sarah E Lamb; Lars G Johnsen; Ingvild Saltvedt Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Sermon; V Boner; K Schwieger; A Boger; S Boonen; P Broos; G Richards; M Windolf Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2011-08-07 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Marc A Müller; Clemens Hengg; Christian Krettek; Detlef van der Velde; Siegfried Eberdorfer; Richard Stange; Gunther O Hofmann; Andreas Platz; Norbert Suhm Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: C Kammerlander; H Doshi; F Gebhard; A Scola; C Meier; W Linhart; M Garcia-Alonso; J Nistal; M Blauth Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Alexander Brunner; Markus Büttler; Uwe Lehmann; Hans Curd Frei; Renato Kratter; Marco Di Lazzaro; Alexander Scola; An Sermon; Rene Attal Journal: Injury Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Matt L Graves; Michael J Gardner Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 2.928
Authors: Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul; Fanny Schwaabe; Christopher Alexander Becker; Christian Kleber; Christoph Linhart; Christoph Thorwächter; Bianka Rubenbauer; Wolfgang Böcker; Axel Greiner Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.374