Abdulkadir Tepeler1, Tuna Karatag2, Adem Tok3, Ekrem Ozyuvali4, Ibrahim Buldu2, Sina Kardas3, Okkes Taha Kucukdagli5, Ali Unsal6. 1. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey. akadirtepeler@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Mevlana University, Konya, Turkey. 3. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Urology, Kecioren Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey. 6. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify patient- and procedure-related factors that increase the risk of hospital readmission and emergency room (ER) visits after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with kidney stones treated via PNL in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2008 and 2014. Patient demographics including age, body mass indices, ASA score, stone size, presence of anatomic abnormality and comorbidity, operative and postoperative measures, and ER visit and rehospitalization rates were reviewed. Unplanned readmission to the hospital, including elective, and ER visits due to any reason related to the PNL procedure were primarily examined. The factors affecting ER visit and rehospitalization rate were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients (mean age 46.57 years) were enrolled into the study. Mean stone size was 28.5 mm. Stone-free status was achieved in 81.7 % of the procedures. Complications occurred at a rate of 6.44 % in the postoperative period. ER visit and rehospitalization rates were 5.76 and 5.27 %, respectively. While stone complexity, anatomic abnormalities, and postoperative course were found to be factors affecting ER visit, postoperative course and hospitalization time were main predictors for rehospitalization rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes demonstrate that patients, who had an anatomic abnormality and complex kidney stone, were more likely to have an unplanned hospital readmission. Patients with a history of perioperative and/or postoperative complication seem to have a tendency to unplanned readmission and rehospitalization.
PURPOSE: To identify patient- and procedure-related factors that increase the risk of hospital readmission and emergency room (ER) visits after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with kidney stones treated via PNL in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2008 and 2014. Patient demographics including age, body mass indices, ASA score, stone size, presence of anatomic abnormality and comorbidity, operative and postoperative measures, and ER visit and rehospitalization rates were reviewed. Unplanned readmission to the hospital, including elective, and ER visits due to any reason related to the PNL procedure were primarily examined. The factors affecting ER visit and rehospitalization rate were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients (mean age 46.57 years) were enrolled into the study. Mean stone size was 28.5 mm. Stone-free status was achieved in 81.7 % of the procedures. Complications occurred at a rate of 6.44 % in the postoperative period. ER visit and rehospitalization rates were 5.76 and 5.27 %, respectively. While stone complexity, anatomic abnormalities, and postoperative course were found to be factors affecting ER visit, postoperative course and hospitalization time were main predictors for rehospitalization rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes demonstrate that patients, who had an anatomic abnormality and complex kidney stone, were more likely to have an unplanned hospital readmission. Patients with a history of perioperative and/or postoperative complication seem to have a tendency to unplanned readmission and rehospitalization.
Authors: James N Armitage; John Withington; Jan van der Meulen; David A Cromwell; Jonathan Glass; William G Finch; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Charles D Scales; Christopher S Saigal; Janet M Hanley; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Markus J Bader; Christian Gratzke; Michael Seitz; Rajan Sharma; Christian G Stief; Mahesh Desai Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ibrahim Buldu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Fatih Elbir; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Unsal Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ahmed R El-Nahas; Diaa-Eldin Taha; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Mohamed H Zahran; Mohamed Hassan; Khaled Z Sheir Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Tae Jin Kim; In Jae Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Hak Min Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.226