Literature DB >> 26223976

Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Abdulkadir Tepeler1, Tuna Karatag2, Adem Tok3, Ekrem Ozyuvali4, Ibrahim Buldu2, Sina Kardas3, Okkes Taha Kucukdagli5, Ali Unsal6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify patient- and procedure-related factors that increase the risk of hospital readmission and emergency room (ER) visits after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with kidney stones treated via PNL in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2008 and 2014. Patient demographics including age, body mass indices, ASA score, stone size, presence of anatomic abnormality and comorbidity, operative and postoperative measures, and ER visit and rehospitalization rates were reviewed. Unplanned readmission to the hospital, including elective, and ER visits due to any reason related to the PNL procedure were primarily examined. The factors affecting ER visit and rehospitalization rate were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients (mean age 46.57 years) were enrolled into the study. Mean stone size was 28.5 mm. Stone-free status was achieved in 81.7 % of the procedures. Complications occurred at a rate of 6.44 % in the postoperative period. ER visit and rehospitalization rates were 5.76 and 5.27 %, respectively. While stone complexity, anatomic abnormalities, and postoperative course were found to be factors affecting ER visit, postoperative course and hospitalization time were main predictors for rehospitalization rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes demonstrate that patients, who had an anatomic abnormality and complex kidney stone, were more likely to have an unplanned hospital readmission. Patients with a history of perioperative and/or postoperative complication seem to have a tendency to unplanned readmission and rehospitalization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital readmission; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Rehospitalization; Risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223976     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1641-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  14 in total

Review 1.  The management of complex renal stones.

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; C Renner; F Eisenberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000.

Authors:  A Hesse; E Brändle; D Wilbert; K-U Köhrmann; P Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

4.  Impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Abdullah Armağan; Tolga Akman; Emre Can Polat; Cevper Ersöz; Ramazan Topaktaş; Mehmet Remzi Erdem; Sinasi Yavuz Onol
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database.

Authors:  James N Armitage; John Withington; Jan van der Meulen; David A Cromwell; Jonathan Glass; William G Finch; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Christopher S Saigal; Janet M Hanley; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  The "all-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Markus J Bader; Christian Gratzke; Michael Seitz; Rajan Sharma; Christian G Stief; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A novel model to predict the risk of readmission in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Guy Hidas; Ofer N Gofrit; Shilo Rosenberg; Vladimir Yutkin; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission?

Authors:  Darren Beiko; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Andrea Kokorovic; Gregory Roberts; Sylvia Robb; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  4 in total

1.  Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone?

Authors:  Ibrahim Buldu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Fatih Elbir; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Diaa-Eldin Taha; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Mohamed H Zahran; Mohamed Hassan; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; In Jae Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Hak Min Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones.

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Shanfeng Yin; Huacai Zhu; Donglong Cheng; Yongda Liu; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.436

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.