Literature DB >> 26694186

Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone?

Ibrahim Buldu1, Abdulkadir Tepeler2, Tuna Karatag1, Ekrem Ozyuvali3, Fatih Elbir4, Mustafa Yordam3, Ali Unsal5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate patient- and procedure-related factors associated with hospital re-admission (HR) and re-hospitalization following flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients who underwent f-URS for renal stones in two reference centers between 2011 and 2015 were examined retrospectively. Patients who were re-admitted to the hospital or re-hospitalized for any reason within 30 days after hospital discharge related to the f-URS procedure were evaluated. The patient- and procedure-related factors affecting the re-admission and re-hospitalization rates were revealed using backward stepwise multiple binary logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The study included 647 patients with a mean age of 46.1 ± 13.7 years. The mean BMI was 27.3 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), and the median ASA score was 1.85. The mean stone diameter was 14.2 ± 5.3 mm. The mean operation and fluoroscopy times were 50.2 ± 16.9 min and 43.1 ± 37.6 s, respectively. The mean hospitalization time was 1.42 ± 0.84 days, and the complication rate was 12.8 % (83/647). Overall, 523 (80.3 %) patients became stone-free, while residual fragments <4 mm were detected in 73 (11.3 %) patients. The procedure failed in 7.9 % of the cases. While 82 (12.7 %) patients were re-admitted, 31 (4.8 %) patients were re-hospitalized for further treatment. Stone-free status was an independent predictor of HR, while the stone-free status, hospitalization time, and postoperative complications all predicted re-hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that inability to achieve stone-free status predicted HR and re-hospitalization, while postoperative complication and prolonged hospitalization also predicted re-hospitalization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexible ureteroscopy; Kidney stone; Re-admission; Re-hospitalization; Risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26694186     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1750-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Piotr Bryniarski; Andrzej Paradysz; Marcin Zyczkowski; Andrzej Kupilas; Krzysztof Nowakowski; Rafał Bogacki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Derya Oztuna; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Categorizing intraoperative complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Ural Oguz; Berkan Resorlu; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Cagri Senocak; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database.

Authors:  James N Armitage; John Withington; Jan van der Meulen; David A Cromwell; Jonathan Glass; William G Finch; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Christopher S Saigal; Janet M Hanley; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Adem Tok; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ibrahim Buldu; Sina Kardas; Okkes Taha Kucukdagli; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A novel model to predict the risk of readmission in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Guy Hidas; Ofer N Gofrit; Shilo Rosenberg; Vladimir Yutkin; Ezekiel H Landau; Dov Pode; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Pawan Vasudeva; Biswajit Nanda; Niraj Kumar; Manoj Kumar Das; Sanjeev Kumar Jha
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission?

Authors:  Darren Beiko; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Andrea Kokorovic; Gregory Roberts; Sylvia Robb; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States.

Authors:  Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul W Eggers; Paul L Kimmel; John W Kusek; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; In Jae Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Hak Min Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.