Literature DB >> 28555349

Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Diaa-Eldin Taha2, Mohamed M Elsaadany2, Mohamed H Zahran2, Mohamed Hassan2, Khaled Z Sheir2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine risk factors of hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). The electronic files and images of all patients who underwent SWL for treatment of renal stones between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent SWL with the same electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier Lithotripot S). The data of those who needed hospital admission for treatment of complications within 30 days after SWL were compared with patients who did not require hospital admission. Compared data included patients' demographics (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, and pre-SWL stenting), renal characters (side, hydronephrosis, and solitary kidney), and stone characters (site, length, density, and previous treatment). Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to identify risk factors. The study included 1179 patients. Complications that required hospital admission were observed in 108 patients (9.2%). They included obstructing steinstrasse in 91 (7.7%), peri-renal hematoma in 3 (0.25%), and fever (>38.0 °C) in 14 (1.2%). Independent risk factors on multivariate analysis were solitary kidney (OR 2.855, P = 0.017), pre-SWL stenting (RR 2.03, P = 0.044), ASA II (OR 1.965, P = 0.007), hydronephrosis (RR 1.639, P = 0.024), and stone length (RR 1.083, P < 0.001). Patients with medical co-morbidities, pre-SWL ureteral stents, large stones and those with obstructed and/or solitary renal unit are more liable to post-SWL complications that need hospital admission. The probability of hospital admission has to be explained to patients with these risk factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Hospital admission; Renal stones; SWL

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555349     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0983-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  25 in total

1.  Thirty-day readmissions--truth and consequences.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients.

Authors:  Sepehr Salem; Abdolrasoul Mehrsai; Hamed Zartab; Nematollah Shahdadi; Gholamreza Pourmand
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-17

3.  Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not Required for Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a National Shockwave Lithotripsy Database in New Zealand.

Authors:  Cameron E Alexander; Stuart Gowland; Jon Cadwallader; Dave Hopkins; John M Reynard; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Causes of hospital readmissions after urologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; H Abraham Chiang; Akshay Sood; Logan Campbell; Felix K-H Chun; Deepansh Dalela; James Okwara; Jesse D Sammon; Adam S Kibel; Mani Menon; Margit Fisch; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Risk factors of hospital readmission after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: analysis of a large contemporary series.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Samer El-Halwagy; Mahmoud Laymon; Ahmed Mosbah; Hassan Abol-Enein; Atalla A Shaaban
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Khaled Z Sheir; Emad Elsobky; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission?

Authors:  Darren Beiko; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Andrea Kokorovic; Gregory Roberts; Sylvia Robb; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular weight heparins on the formation of renal hematoma after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Christoph Schregel; Hubert John; Marco Randazzo; Isabelle Keller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Clinical use of renal point-of-care ultrasound after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Luís Magalhães; Ramon Nogué
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2019-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.