BACKGROUND: In percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), the best possible way to access the collecting system is still a matter of debate. There is little possibility of correcting a suboptimal access. OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience using a micro-optical system through a specific puncture needle to confirm the quality of the chosen access prior to dilatation of the operating tract. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Micro-optics of 0.9- and 0.6-mm diameter were used. The micro-optic with integrated light lead was inserted through the working sheath of the puncture needle. The modified needle had a 1.6-mm (4.85-Fr) outer diameter. The optical fiber was connected via a zoom ocular and light adapter to a standard endoscopic camera system. For sufficient intraoperative sight, an irrigation system was connected. INTERVENTION: The optical puncture needle was used in 15 patients for renal access prior to standard PNL procedures. MEASUREMENTS: The optical assessment included determination of the distortion, resolution, angle, and field of view. The irrigation flow was assessed in an ex vivo setting, with the puncture stylet or the needle shaft either empty or with a 0.018-in guidewire inserted. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In all cases, visualization of the punctured kidney calyces was successful and the presence of the target calculi could be confirmed prior to guidewire placement and tract dilation. The 0.9-mm optic was found to be significantly superior in all optical parameters in contrast to the 0.6-mm optic. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The optical puncture needle for PNL appears to be most helpful for confirming the optimal percutaneous access to the kidney prior to dilation of the nephrostomy tract, improving the safety of the technique.
BACKGROUND: In percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), the best possible way to access the collecting system is still a matter of debate. There is little possibility of correcting a suboptimal access. OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience using a micro-optical system through a specific puncture needle to confirm the quality of the chosen access prior to dilatation of the operating tract. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Micro-optics of 0.9- and 0.6-mm diameter were used. The micro-optic with integrated light lead was inserted through the working sheath of the puncture needle. The modified needle had a 1.6-mm (4.85-Fr) outer diameter. The optical fiber was connected via a zoom ocular and light adapter to a standard endoscopic camera system. For sufficient intraoperative sight, an irrigation system was connected. INTERVENTION: The optical puncture needle was used in 15 patients for renal access prior to standard PNL procedures. MEASUREMENTS: The optical assessment included determination of the distortion, resolution, angle, and field of view. The irrigation flow was assessed in an ex vivo setting, with the puncture stylet or the needle shaft either empty or with a 0.018-in guidewire inserted. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In all cases, visualization of the punctured kidney calyces was successful and the presence of the target calculi could be confirmed prior to guidewire placement and tract dilation. The 0.9-mm optic was found to be significantly superior in all optical parameters in contrast to the 0.6-mm optic. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The optical puncture needle for PNL appears to be most helpful for confirming the optimal percutaneous access to the kidney prior to dilation of the nephrostomy tract, improving the safety of the technique.
Authors: Murat Bagcioglu; Aslan Demir; Hasan Sulhan; Mert Ali Karadag; Mehmet Uslu; Umit Yener Tekdogan Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Udo Nagele; Ute Walcher; Markus Bader; Thomas Herrmann; Stephan Kruck; David Schilling Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tuna Karatag; Ibrahim Buldu; Mehmet Kaynar; Ramazan Inan; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Gokhan Atis; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mansur Daggulli; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Tuna Karatag; Cenk Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Turhan Caskurlu Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 3.436