Literature DB >> 24053772

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database.

James N Armitage1, John Withington, Jan van der Meulen, David A Cromwell, Jonathan Glass, William G Finch, Stuart O Irving, Neil A Burgess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the postoperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We extracted records from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database for all patients undergoing PCNL between March 2006 and January 2011 in English NHS hospitals. Outcome measures were haemorrhage, infection within the index admission, and rates of emergency readmission and in-hospital mortality within 30 days of surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 5750 index PCNL procedures were performed in 165 hospitals. During the index admission, haemorrhage was recorded in 81 patients (1.4%), 192 patients (3.8%) had a urinary tract infection (UTI), 95 patients (1.7%) had fever, and 41 patients (0.7%) had sepsis. There were 595 emergency readmissions in 518 patients (9.0%). Reasons for readmission were varied: 70 (1.2%) with UTI, 15 (0.3%) sepsis, 73 (1.3%) haematuria, 25 (0.4%) haemorrhage, and 25 (0.4%) acute urinary retention. There were 13 (0.2%) in-hospital deaths within 30 days of surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Haemorrhage and infection represent relatively common and potentially severe complications of PCNL. Mortality is extremely rare after PCNL (about one in 400 procedures overall) but almost one in 10 patients have an unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. Complications of PCNL may be under-reported in the HES database and need to be corroborated using other data sources.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  database; healthcare quality; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053772     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone?

Authors:  Ibrahim Buldu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Fatih Elbir; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?

Authors:  Martin Schoenthaler; Simon Hein; Christian Seitz; Christian Türk; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner Vach; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Analysis of factors affecting re-admission after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; In Jae Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Hak Min Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Adem Tok; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ibrahim Buldu; Sina Kardas; Okkes Taha Kucukdagli; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.