Literature DB >> 26217878

Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation.

D E Schiavazzi1, G Arbia2, C Baker3, A M Hlavacek4, T Y Hsia3, A L Marsden1, I E Vignon-Clementel2.   

Abstract

The adoption of simulation tools to predict surgical outcomes is increasingly leading to questions about the variability of these predictions in the presence of uncertainty associated with the input clinical data. In the present study, we propose a methodology for full propagation of uncertainty from clinical data to model results that, unlike deterministic simulation, enables estimation of the confidence associated with model predictions. We illustrate this problem in a virtual stage II single ventricle palliation surgery example. First, probability density functions (PDFs) of right pulmonary artery (PA) flow split ratio and average pulmonary pressure are determined from clinical measurements, complemented by literature data. Starting from a zero-dimensional semi-empirical approximation, Bayesian parameter estimation is used to find the distributions of boundary conditions that produce the expected PA flow split and average pressure PDFs as pre-operative model results. To reduce computational cost, this inverse problem is solved using a Kriging approximant. Second, uncertainties in the boundary conditions are propagated to simulation predictions. Sparse grid stochastic collocation is employed to statistically characterize model predictions of post-operative hemodynamics in models with and without PA stenosis. The results quantify the statistical variability in virtual surgery predictions, allowing for placement of confidence intervals on simulation outputs.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fontan palliation surgery; inverse Bayesian parameter estimation; single ventricle congenital heart disease; sparse grids; uncertainty quantification; virtual surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26217878     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  19 in total

1.  Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Justin S Tran; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.756

2.  Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Jwala Dhamala; Hermenegild J Arevalo; John Sapp; B Milan Horácek; Katherine C Wu; Natalia A Trayanova; Linwei Wang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  A generalized multi-resolution expansion for uncertainty propagation with application to cardiovascular modeling.

Authors:  D E Schiavazzi; A Doostan; G Iaccarino; A L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Uncertainty Quantification in a Patient-Specific One-Dimensional Arterial Network Model: EnKF-Based Inflow Estimator.

Authors:  Andrea Arnold; Christina Battista; Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo German; Ricardo L Armentano; Hien Tran; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2017-02-22

5.  Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow.

Authors:  Martin R Pfaller; Jonathan Pham; Aekaansh Verma; Luca Pegolotti; Nathan M Wilson; David W Parker; Weiguang Yang; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 2.648

6.  Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Philipp Berg; Samuel Voß; Gábor Janiga; Sylvia Saalfeld; Aslak W Bergersen; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Jan Bruening; Leonid Goubergrits; Andreas Spuler; Tin Lok Chiu; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gabriele Copelli; Benjamin Csippa; György Paál; Gábor Závodszky; Felicitas J Detmer; Bong J Chung; Juan R Cebral; Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Christof Karmonik; Saba Elias; Nicole M Cancelliere; Mehdi Najafi; David A Steinman; Vitor M Pereira; Senol Piskin; Ender A Finol; Mariya Pravdivtseva; Prasanth Velvaluri; Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Santhosh Seshadhri; Sreenivas Venguru; Masaaki Shojima; Sergey Sindeev; Sergey Frolov; Yi Qian; Yu-An Wu; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Computational modeling and engineering in pediatric and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden; Jeffrey A Feinstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.856

8.  Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Casey M Fleeter; Gianluca Geraci; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.756

9.  The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Authors:  Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 10.  Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Phillip M Trusty; Timothy C Slesnick; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Jarek Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.