Literature DB >> 31223175

Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Justin S Tran1, Daniele E Schiavazzi2, Andrew M Kahn3, Alison L Marsden4.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is performed on more than 400,000 patients annually in the U.S. However, saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) implanted during CABG exhibit poor patency compared to arterial grafts, with failure rates up to 40% within 10 years after surgery. Differences in mechanical stimuli are known to play a role in driving maladaptation and have been correlated with endothelial damage and thrombus formation. As these quantities are difficult to measure in vivo, multi-scale coronary models offer a way to quantify them, while accounting for complex coronary physiology. However, prior studies have primarily focused on deterministic evaluations, without reporting variability in the model parameters due to uncertainty. This study aims to assess confidence in multi-scale predictions of wall shear stress and wall strain while accounting for uncertainty in peripheral hemodynamics and material properties. Boundary condition distributions are computed by assimilating uncertain clinical data, while spatial variations of vessel wall stiffness are obtained through approximation by a random field. We developed a stochastic submodeling approach to mitigate the computational burden of repeated multi-scale model evaluations to focus exclusively on the bypass grafts. This produces a two-level decomposition of quantities of interest into submodel contributions and full model/submodel discrepancies. We leverage these two levels in the context of forward uncertainty propagation using a previously proposed multi-resolution approach. The time- and space-averaged wall shear stress is well estimated with a coefficient of variation of <35%, but ignorance about the spatial distribution on the wall elastic modulus and thickness lead to large variations in an objective measure of wall strain, with coefficients of variation up to 100%. Sensitivity analysis reveals how the interactions between the flow and material parameters contribute to output variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Uncertainty quantification; cardiovascular modeling; coronary bypass graft; random field; sensitivity analysis; submodelling

Year:  2018        PMID: 31223175      PMCID: PMC6586227          DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng        ISSN: 0045-7825            Impact factor:   6.756


  33 in total

1.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient-specific multiscale modeling of blood flow for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Sethuraman Sankaran; Mahdi Esmaily Moghadam; Andrew M Kahn; Elaine E Tseng; Julius M Guccione; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations.

Authors:  Sethuraman Sankaran; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Habib Samady; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; Jin Suo; Saurabh S Dhawan; Charles Maynard; Lucas H Timmins; Arshed A Quyyumi; Don P Giddens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Long-term preservation of human saphenous vein by green tea polyphenol under physiological conditions.

Authors:  Dong-Wook Han; Young Hwan Park; Jeong Koo Kim; Tae Gon Jung; Kwon-Yong Lee; Suong-Hyu Hyon; Jong-Chul Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

6.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Computational simulations of hemodynamic changes within thoracic, coronary, and cerebral arteries following early wall remodeling in response to distal aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Jessica S Coogan; Jay D Humphrey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

Authors:  Steven Goldman; Karen Zadina; Thomas Moritz; Theron Ovitt; Gulshan Sethi; Jack G Copeland; Lizy Thottapurathu; Barbara Krasnicka; Nancy Ellis; Robert J Anderson; William Henderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  H J Kim; I E Vignon-Clementel; J S Coogan; C A Figueroa; K E Jansen; C A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Adam E Flanders; Birgitta Velthuis; Reto Meuli; Maarten van Leeuwen; Dorit Goldsher; Carissa Pineda; Joaquin Serena; Irene van der Schaaf; Annet Waaijer; James Anderson; Gary Nesbit; Igal Gabriely; Victoria Medina; Ana Quiles; Scott Pohlman; Marcel Quist; Pierre Schnyder; Julien Bogousslavsky; William P Dillon; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  5 in total

1.  Geometric Uncertainty in Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Modeling with Convolutional Dropout Networks.

Authors:  Gabriel D Maher; Casey M Fleeter; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 6.588

2.  Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Casey M Fleeter; Gianluca Geraci; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Authors:  Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?

Authors:  Grace C Y Peng; Mark Alber; Adrian Buganza Tepole; William R Cannon; Suvranu De; Salvador Dura-Bernal; Krishna Garikipati; George Karniadakis; William W Lytton; Paris Perdikaris; Linda Petzold; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Arch Comput Methods Eng       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.302

5.  A new noninvasive and patient-specific hemodynamic index for the severity of renal stenosis and outcome of interventional treatment.

Authors:  Huidan Yu; Monsurul Khan; Hao Wu; Xiaoping Du; Rou Chen; Dave M Rollins; Xin Fang; Jianyun Long; Chenke Xu; Alan P Sawchuk
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.648

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.