Alison L Marsden1, Jeffrey A Feinstein. 1. aDepartments of Pediatrics and Bioengineering, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering bDepartments of Pediatrics and Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent methodological advances in computational simulations are enabling increasingly realistic simulations of hemodynamics and physiology, driving increased clinical utility. We review recent developments in the use of computational simulations in pediatric and congenital heart disease, describe the clinical impact in modeling in single-ventricle patients, and provide an overview of emerging areas. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiscale modeling combining patient-specific hemodynamics with reduced order (i.e., mathematically and computationally simplified) circulatory models has become the de-facto standard for modeling local hemodynamics and 'global' circulatory physiology. We review recent advances that have enabled faster solutions, discuss new methods (e.g., fluid structure interaction and uncertainty quantification), which lend realism both computationally and clinically to results, highlight novel computationally derived surgical methods for single-ventricle patients, and discuss areas in which modeling has begun to exert its influence including Kawasaki disease, fetal circulation, tetralogy of Fallot (and pulmonary tree), and circulatory support. SUMMARY: Computational modeling is emerging as a crucial tool for clinical decision-making and evaluation of novel surgical methods and interventions in pediatric cardiology and beyond. Continued development of modeling methods, with an eye towards clinical needs, will enable clinical adoption in a wide range of pediatric and congenital heart diseases.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent methodological advances in computational simulations are enabling increasingly realistic simulations of hemodynamics and physiology, driving increased clinical utility. We review recent developments in the use of computational simulations in pediatric and congenital heart disease, describe the clinical impact in modeling in single-ventricle patients, and provide an overview of emerging areas. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiscale modeling combining patient-specific hemodynamics with reduced order (i.e., mathematically and computationally simplified) circulatory models has become the de-facto standard for modeling local hemodynamics and 'global' circulatory physiology. We review recent advances that have enabled faster solutions, discuss new methods (e.g., fluid structure interaction and uncertainty quantification), which lend realism both computationally and clinically to results, highlight novel computationally derived surgical methods for single-ventricle patients, and discuss areas in which modeling has begun to exert its influence including Kawasaki disease, fetal circulation, tetralogy of Fallot (and pulmonary tree), and circulatory support. SUMMARY: Computational modeling is emerging as a crucial tool for clinical decision-making and evaluation of novel surgical methods and interventions in pediatric cardiology and beyond. Continued development of modeling methods, with an eye towards clinical needs, will enable clinical adoption in a wide range of pediatric and congenital heart diseases.
Authors: Arjun Menon; Thomas J Eddinger; Hongfeng Wang; David C Wendell; Jeffrey M Toth; John F LaDisa Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mark A Fogel; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Diane de Zelicourt; Lakshmi P Dasi; Tom Pawlowski; Jack Rome; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Arash Kheradvar; Elliott M Groves; Craig J Goergen; S Hamed Alavi; Robert Tranquillo; Craig A Simmons; Lakshmi P Dasi; K Jane Grande-Allen; Mohammad R K Mofrad; Ahmad Falahatpisheh; Boyce Griffith; Frank Baaijens; Stephen H Little; Suncica Canic Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Francesco Migliavacca; Rossella Balossino; Giancarlo Pennati; Gabriele Dubini; Tain-Yen Hsia; Marc R de Leval; Edward L Bove Journal: J Biomech Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Nickolas Forsch; Sachin Govil; James C Perry; Sanjeet Hegde; Alistair A Young; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: J Comput Sci Date: 2020-09-19
Authors: Giovanni Biglino; Claudio Capelli; Jan Bruse; Giorgia M Bosi; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano Journal: Heart Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Liam Swanson; Benjamin Owen; Amir Keshmiri; Amin Deyranlou; Thomas Aldersley; John Lawrenson; Paul Human; Rik De Decker; Barend Fourie; George Comitis; Mark E Engel; Bernard Keavney; Liesl Zühlke; Malebogo Ngoepe; Alistair Revell Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: Ryan Pewowaruk; David Rutkowski; Diego Hernando; Bunmi B Kumapayi; Wade Bushman; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240