Literature DB >> 32419369

The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Jongmin Seo1, Daniele E Schiavazzi2, Andrew M Kahn3, Alison L Marsden1.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular simulations are increasingly used for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, to guide treatment decisions, and in the design of medical devices. Quantitative assessment of the variability of simulation outputs due to input uncertainty is a key step toward further integration of cardiovascular simulations in the clinical workflow. In this study, we present uncertainty quantification in computational models of the coronary circulation to investigate the effect of uncertain parameters, including coronary pressure waveform, intramyocardial pressure, morphometry exponent, and the vascular wall Young's modulus. We employ a left coronary artery model with deformable vessel walls, simulated via an Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian framework for fluid-structure interaction, with a prescribed inlet pressure and open-loop lumped parameter network outlet boundary conditions. Stochastic modeling of the uncertain inputs is determined from intra-coronary catheterization data or gathered from the literature. Uncertainty propagation is performed using several approaches including Monte Carlo, Quasi Monte Carlo sampling, stochastic collocation, and multi-wavelet stochastic expansion. Variabilities in the quantities of interest, including branch pressure, flow, wall shear stress, and wall deformation are assessed. We find that uncertainty in inlet pressures and intramyocardial pressures significantly affect all resulting QoIs, while uncertainty in elastic modulus only affects the mechanical response of the vascular wall. Variability in the morphometry exponent used to distribute the total downstream vascular resistance to the single outlets, has little effect on coronary hemodynamics or wall mechanics. Finally, we compare convergence behaviors of statistics of QoIs using several uncertainty propagation methods on three model benchmark problems and the left coronary simulations. From the simulation results, we conclude that the multi-wavelet stochastic expansion shows superior accuracy and performance against Quasi Monte Carlo and stochastic collocation methods.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular simulation; fluid-structure interaction; uncertainty quantification

Year:  2020        PMID: 32419369      PMCID: PMC8211426          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  63 in total

1.  Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation.

Authors:  D E Schiavazzi; G Arbia; C Baker; A M Hlavacek; T Y Hsia; A L Marsden; I E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Vessel caliber and branch-angle of human coronary artery branch-points.

Authors:  G M Hutchins; M M Miner; J K Boitnott
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Justin S Tran; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Habib Samady; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; Jin Suo; Saurabh S Dhawan; Charles Maynard; Lucas H Timmins; Arshed A Quyyumi; Don P Giddens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The impact of personalized probabilistic wall thickness models on peak wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J Biehler; W A Wall
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries.

Authors:  Alireza Karimi; Mahdi Navidbakhsh; Ahmad Shojaei; Shahab Faghihi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.328

7.  Outer radius-wall thickness ratio, a postmortem quantitative histology in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  B K Podesser; F Neumann; M Neumann; W Schreiner; G Wollenek; R Mallinger
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1998

8.  Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation.

Authors:  J T Dodge; B G Brown; E L Bolson; H T Dodge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; Jin Suo; Parham Eshtehardi; David S Molony; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Don P Giddens; Habib Samady
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  On connecting large vessels to small. The meaning of Murray's law.

Authors:  T F Sherman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow.

Authors:  Martin R Pfaller; Jonathan Pham; Aekaansh Verma; Luca Pegolotti; Nathan M Wilson; David W Parker; Weiguang Yang; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 2.648

2.  A 1D-3D Hybrid Model of Patient-Specific Coronary Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Noelia Grande Gutiérrez; Talid Sinno; Scott L Diamond
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.305

3.  Geometric Uncertainty in Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Modeling with Convolutional Dropout Networks.

Authors:  Gabriel D Maher; Casey M Fleeter; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 6.588

4.  Patient-specific fluid-structure simulations of anomalous aortic origin of right coronary arteries.

Authors:  Michael X Jiang; Muhammad O Khan; Joanna Ghobrial; Ian S Rogers; Gosta B Pettersson; Eugene H Blackstone; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Uncertainty quantification in cerebral circulation simulations focusing on the collateral flow: Surrogate model approach with machine learning.

Authors:  Changyoung Yuhn; Marie Oshima; Yan Chen; Motoharu Hayakawa; Shigeki Yamada
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.