| Literature DB >> 26184240 |
Liaqat Ali1, Abdul Latif Khan2, Lubna Al-Kharusi3, Javid Hussain4,5, Ahmed Al-Harrasi6,7.
Abstract
The marine ecosystem has been a key resource for secondary metabolites with promising biological roles. In the current study, bioassay-guided phytochemical investigations were carried out to assess the presence of enzyme inhibitory chemical constituents from the methanolic extract of marine green alga-Codium dwarkense. The bioactive fractions were further subjected to chromatographic separations, which resulted in the isolation of a new triterpenic acid; dwarkenoic acid (1) and the known sterols; androst-5-en-3β-ol (2), stigmasta-5,25-dien-3β,7α-diol (3), ergosta-5,25-dien-3β-ol (4), 7-hydroxystigmasta-4,25-dien-3-one-7-O-β-d-fucopyranoside (5), 7-hydroxystigmasta-4,25-dien-3-one (6), and stigmasta-5,25-dien-3β-ol (7). The structure elucidation of the new compound was carried out by combined mass spectrometry and 1D (1H and 13C) and 2D (HSQC, HMBC, COSY, and NOESY) NMR spectroscopic data. The sub-fractions and pure constituents were assayed for enzymatic inhibition of alpha-glucosidase. Compound 1 showed significant inhibition at all concentrations. Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 7 exhibited a dose-dependent response, whereas compounds 4-6 showed moderate inhibition. Utilizing such marine-derived biological resources could lead to drug discoveries related to anti-diabetics.Entities:
Keywords: Codium dwarkense; characterization; enzyme inhibition; isolation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184240 PMCID: PMC4515621 DOI: 10.3390/md13074344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of Compounds 1–7.
Figure 2Major Mass Fragments in Compound 1.
13C and 1H NMR data (150 and 600 MHz; CDCl3) and HMBC correlations for compound 1.
| C. No. | 13C (δ) | 1H (δ) | Multiplicity | Key HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.9 | 1.50, m | CH2 | |
| 2 | 23.5 | 2.11, m; 2.21, m | CH2 | |
| 3 | 73.1 | 5.29, br s | CH | 1,2,32 |
| 4 | 33.9 | - | C | |
| 5 | 164.9 | - | C | |
| 6 | 130.5 | 5.54, s | CH | 5,7 |
| 7 | 199.4 | - | C | |
| 8 | 45.1 | - | C | |
| 9 | 60.1 | 2.39, m | CH | 8,10 |
| 10 | 37.3 | - | C | |
| 11 | 27.2 | 1.87, m; 1.98, m | CH2 | |
| 12 | 29.7 | 1.89, m; 2.08, m | CH2 | |
| 13 | 50.4 | 1.38, m | CH | |
| 14 | 46.3 | - | C | |
| 15 | 32.8 | 1.45, m; 1.66, m | CH2 | |
| 16 | 34.6 | 2.29, m; 2.51, m | CH2 | |
| 17 | 43.8 | - | C | |
| 18 | 59.0 | 1.54, m | CH | 13,17,28 |
| 19 | 39.2 | 1.37, m | CH | |
| 20 | 39.3 | 0.92, m | CH | |
| 21 | 30.9 | 1.27, m; 1.42, m | CH2 | |
| 22 | 27.5 | 0.99, m, 1.20, m | CH2 | |
| 23 | 28.9 | 0.81, s | CH3 | 4 |
| 24 | 21.1 | 0.93, s | CH3 | 4 |
| 25 | 20.5 | 1.33, s | CH3 | |
| 26 | 13.3 | 1.14, s | CH3 | |
| 27 | 18.3 | 1.18, s | CH3 | |
| 28 | 179.1 | - | C | |
| 29 | 17.4 | 0.78, d, | CH3 | |
| 30 | 23.8 | 1.23, d, | CH3 | |
| 31 | 170.2 | - | COCH3 | |
| 32 | 21.3 | 2.07, s | COCH3 | 3,31 |
Figure 3Key COSY (bold) and Selected HMBC (arrows) Correlations in Compound 1.
Figure 4Key NOESY Interactions in Compound 1.
Figure 5Biogenetic pathway for compound 1.
Figure 6Effects of two different concentrations of various polarity fractions obtained from the crude methanolic extract of Codium dwarkense against α-glucosidase inhibition. The bars in the graph shows mean of three replicates with standard error.
Figure 7α-Glucosidase enzyme inhibitory effect of compounds 1–7 isolated from fractions showing higher suppression level. The graph shows mean of three replications with standard error. The inhibition absorbance was analyzed through Graphpad Prism (ver 5.05, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) using non-linear regression curve fit for inhibitor vs. effect response. The line shows the IC50 log curve as per dosage of the compounds. Curve values with precision near R = 1.0 has been regarded ideal dosage with regards to standard curve.