| Literature DB >> 28106757 |
Liaqat Ali1, Abdul Latif Khan2, Muhammad Al-Broumi3, Rashid Al-Harrasi4, Lubna Al-Kharusi5, Javid Hussain6,7, Ahmed Al-Harrasi8,9.
Abstract
In continuation to our study of the chemical and biological potential of the secondary metabolites isolated from Omani seaweeds, we investigated a marine brown alga, Padina boergesenii. The phytochemical investigation resulted in the isolation of a new secondary metabolite, padinolic acid (1), along with some other semi-pure fractions and sub-fractions. The planar structure was confirmed through MS and NMR (1D and 2D) spectral data. The NOESY experiments coupled with the biogenetic consideration were helpful in assigning the stereochemistry in the molecule. Compound 1 was subjected to enzyme inhibition studies using urease, lipid peroxidase, and alpha-glucosidase enzymes. Compound 1 showed low to moderate α-glucosidase and urease enzyme inhibition, respectively, and moderate anti-lipid peroxidation activities. The current study indicates the potential of this seaweed and provides the basis for further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Padina boergesenii; enzyme inhibition; phytochemical investigation; structure elucidation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28106757 PMCID: PMC5295239 DOI: 10.3390/md15010019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structure of padinolic acid (1).
Figure 2Major MS fragmentation in compound 1.
1H and 13C NMR data (600 and 150 MHz; CD3OD) and key HMBC correlations in compound 1.
| C. No. | 13C (δ) | 1H (δ) | DEPT | C. No. | 13C (δ) | 1H (δ) | DEPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.1 | 0.99, m; 1.71, m | CH2 | 16 | 31.7 | 1.35, m | CH2 |
| 2 | 28.0 | 1.57, m | CH2 | 17 | 50.4 | 1.63, m | CH |
| 3 | 79.6 | 3.16, m | CH | 18 | 180.1 | - | C |
| 4 | 41.9 | - | C | 19 | 15.1 | 1.03, s | CH3 |
| 5 | 56.9 | 0.73, m | CH | 20 | 39.6 | 1.67, m | CH |
| 6 | 19.4 | 1.56, m | CH2 | 21 | 16.7 | 0.88, d, | CH3 |
| 7 | 126.9 | 5.25, m | CH | 22 | 35.6 | 1.42, m | CH2 |
| 8 | 139.7 | - | C | 23 | 33.3 | 1.52, m | CH2 |
| 9 | 54.4 | 2.21, m | CH | 24 | 40.4 | 2.33, m | CH |
| 10 | 38.3 | - | C | 25 | 152.0 | - | C |
| 11 | 22.1 | 1.46, m | CH2 | 26 | 110.2 | 4.62/4.73, each d, | CH2 |
| 12 | 30.8 | 1.94, m | CH2 | 27 | 19.5 | 1.73, s | CH3 |
| 13 | 57.5 | - | C | 28 | 16.6 | 0.99, overlap | CH3 |
| 14 | 48.5 | 3.06, m | CH | 29 | 16.1 | 0.77, s | CH3 |
| 15 | 26.9 | 1.08, m | CH2 | 30 | 28.6 | 0.97, overlap | CH3 |
Figure 3Key COSY (bold) and selected HMBC (arrows) correlations in Compound 1.
Figure 4Enzyme (α-glucosidase and urease) inhibition and lipid peroxidation potential of compound 1; the values in the bar are the means of three replications presented with the standard error.