Ann DeSmet1, Ross Shegog2, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem3, Geert Crombez3, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij1. 1. 1 Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium . 2. 2 Center for Health Promotion & Prevention Research, School of Public Health, University of Texas , Houston, Texas. 3. 3 Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium .
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Serious games may be effective in promoting sexual health behavior. Their confidential nature may encourage users to discuss sensitive sexuality topics. Furthermore, they can tailor messages to the individual's needs and may be intrinsically motivating. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of interventions for sexual health promotion that use serious games. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for publications before the end of July 2013. Serious digital games studies measuring effects on behavior or its determinants, using a control condition, allowing the calculation of an effect size (Hedges' g, random-effects model) were included. RESULTS: Seven game studies for sexual health promotion were included. These showed positive effects on determinants (g=0.242; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.129, 0.356), albeit of small effect size. The effects on behavior, measured in only two studies, were not significant (g=0.456; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.649, 1.561). Most games did not use many game features that are considered to be immersive or enhancing flow. Instead, there was a strong reliance on pure gamification features, such as rewards and feedback. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the next generation of games may be enhanced by building on the behavioral change and educational gaming literatures (e.g., using role-play and simulation game formats, individual tailoring, offering adaptation in the difficulty of the challenge, and amount and timing of the feedback). There is a need for studies with rigorous evaluations of game effectiveness, longer-term follow-up, and using measures of behavior rather than merely their determinants.
OBJECTIVE: Serious games may be effective in promoting sexual health behavior. Their confidential nature may encourage users to discuss sensitive sexuality topics. Furthermore, they can tailor messages to the individual's needs and may be intrinsically motivating. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of interventions for sexual health promotion that use serious games. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for publications before the end of July 2013. Serious digital games studies measuring effects on behavior or its determinants, using a control condition, allowing the calculation of an effect size (Hedges' g, random-effects model) were included. RESULTS: Seven game studies for sexual health promotion were included. These showed positive effects on determinants (g=0.242; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.129, 0.356), albeit of small effect size. The effects on behavior, measured in only two studies, were not significant (g=0.456; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.649, 1.561). Most games did not use many game features that are considered to be immersive or enhancing flow. Instead, there was a strong reliance on pure gamification features, such as rewards and feedback. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the next generation of games may be enhanced by building on the behavioral change and educational gaming literatures (e.g., using role-play and simulation game formats, individual tailoring, offering adaptation in the difficulty of the challenge, and amount and timing of the feedback). There is a need for studies with rigorous evaluations of game effectiveness, longer-term follow-up, and using measures of behavior rather than merely their determinants.
Authors: Lauren J Van Scoy; Michael J Green; Jean M Reading; Allison M Scott; Cynthia H Chuang; Benjamin H Levi Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Kathryn E Muessig; José A Bauermeister; Sara LeGrand; Lynn E Fiellin Journal: Curr Opin HIV AIDS Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Kathryn E Muessig; Jose Bauermeister; Chen Zhang; Sara LeGrand Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Tom Baranowski; Fran Blumberg; Richard Buday; Ann DeSmet; Lynn E Fiellin; C Shawn Green; Pamela M Kato; Amy Shirong Lu; Ann E Maloney; Robin Mellecker; Brooke A Morrill; Wei Peng; Ross Shegog; Monique Simons; Amanda E Staiano; Debbe Thompson; Kimberly Young Journal: Games Health J Date: 2015-08-11
Authors: Kévin Cardoso de Sá; Márcio Garcia Martins; Cristiano André da Costa; Jorge Luis Victoria Barbosa; Rodrigo da Rosa Righi Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Ann DeSmet; Debbe Thompson; Tom Baranowski; Antonio Palmeira; Maïté Verloigne; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 5.428