Literature DB >> 26164446

Effects of Skin Thickness on Cochlear Input Signal Using Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.

Jameson K Mattingly1, Nathaniel T Greene, Herman A Jenkins, Daniel J Tollin, James R Easter, Stephen P Cass.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Intracochlear sound pressures (PIC) and velocity measurements of the stapes, round window, and promontory (VStap/RW/Prom) will show frequency-dependent attenuation using magnet-based transcutaneous bone conduction implants (TCBCIs) in comparison with direct-connect skin-penetrating implants (DCBCIs).
BACKGROUND: TCBCIs have recently been introduced as alternatives to DCBCIs. Clinical studies have demonstrated elevated high-frequency thresholds for TCBCIs as compared with DCBCIs; however, little data exist examining the direct effect of skin thickness on the cochlear input signal using TCBCIs.
METHODS: Using seven cadaveric heads, PIC was measured in the scala vestibuli and tympani with fiber-optic pressure sensors concurrently with VStap/RW/Prom via laser Doppler vibrometry. Ipsilateral titanium implant fixtures were placed and connected to either a DCBCI or a TCBCI. Soft tissue flaps with varying thicknesses (no flap and 3, 6, and 9 mm) were placed successively between the magnetic plate and sound processor magnet. A bone conduction transducer coupled to custom software provided pure-tone stimuli between 120 and 10,240 Hz.
RESULTS: Stimulation via the DCBCI produced the largest response magnitudes. The TCBCI showed similar PSV/ST and VStap/RW/Prom with no intervening flap and a frequency-dependent nonlinear reduction of magnitude with increasing flap thickness. Phase shows a comparable dependence on transmission delay as the acoustic baseline, and the slope steepens at higher frequencies as flap thickness increases, suggesting a longer group delay.
CONCLUSION: Proper soft tissue management is critical to optimize the cochlear input signal. The skin thickness-related effects on cochlear response magnitudes should be taken into account when selecting patients for a TCBCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26164446      PMCID: PMC4537381          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  26 in total

1.  Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Active middle ear implant application in case of stapes fixation: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Arnaud Devèze; Kanthaiah Koka; Stéphane Tringali; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

Authors:  Catharina A J Dun; Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with acquired and congenital unilateral inner ear deafness (Baha CROS): clinical evaluation of 56 cases.

Authors:  Myrthe K S Hol; Sylvia J W Kunst; Ad F M Snik; Arjan J Bosman; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Improved horizontal directional hearing in bone conduction device users with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Martijn J H Agterberg; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol; Thamar E M van Esch; Cor W R J Cremers; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-14

6.  Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Albert Mudry; Anders Tjellström
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

7.  Estimation of bone conduction skull transmission by hearing thresholds and ear-canal sound pressure.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Stefan Stenfelt; Bo Håkansson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant.

Authors:  Myrthe K S Hol; Rik C Nelissen; Martijn J H Agterberg; Cor W R J Cremers; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids.

Authors:  Ruwan Kiringoda; Lawrence R Lustig
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Horizontal plane localization in single-sided deaf adults fitted with a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha).

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; David S Haynes; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Robert F Labadie; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  17 in total

1.  Intracochlear Measurements of Interaural Time and Level Differences Conveyed by Bilateral Bone Conduction Systems.

Authors:  Nyssa F Farrell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Lateral Semicircular Canal Pressures During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: a Possible Mechanism for Postoperative Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Mohamed A Alhussaini; James R Easter; Theodore F Argo; Tim Walilko; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Christopher Kaufmann; Marlan R Hansen; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Ideal Flap Cover for the Salvage of Exposed/Infected Cochlear Implants: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  N C Hariharan; R Muthukumar; R Sridhar; B Shankari; V S Valarmathy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-12

8.  Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.