Literature DB >> 23422311

Estimation of bone conduction skull transmission by hearing thresholds and ear-canal sound pressure.

Sabine Reinfeldt1, Stefan Stenfelt, Bo Håkansson.   

Abstract

Bone conduction sound transmission in the human skull and the occlusion effect were estimated from hearing thresholds and ear-canal sound pressure (ECSP) measured by a probe tube microphone when stimulation was at three positions on the skull (ipsilateral mastoid, contralateral mastoid, and forehead). The measurements were done with the ear-canal open as well as occluded by an ear-plug. Depending on the estimation method, transcranial transmission at frequencies below 1 kHz was between -8 and 5 dB, around 0 dB at 1 kHz that decreased with frequency to between -17 and -7 dB at 8 kHz. The forehead transmission was, except at frequencies between 1 and 2 kHz, similar to that proposed in the standard ISO:389-3 (1994) when the threshold measurements were conducted with open ear-canals. Compared with the same measurements using hearing thresholds, the ECSP gave similar transmission results at most frequencies, but differed at 0.5, 0.75, 2 and 3 kHz. One probable reason for the differences between thresholds and ECSP might be a significant perception improvement (lower thresholds) when the stimulation was at the ipsilateral mastoid that was not found at the other positions. This improvement, which also was present in the occlusion effect data, was hypothesized to originate in greater sensitivity of the cochlea for vibration in line with the ipsilateral stimulation direction than from other directions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422311     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; Xiying Guan; Rosemary B Farahmand; Brent F Page; Julie P Merchant; Defne Abur; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-31

4.  Effects of Skin Thickness on Cochlear Input Signal Using Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

6.  VEMP using a new low-frequency bone conduction transducer.

Authors:  Bo Håkansson; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Tomas Tengstrand; Leif Johannsen; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Cristina Rigato; Elisabeth Dahlström; Sabine Reinfeldt
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-09-06

7.  Effects of Stimulation Position and Frequency Band on Auditory Spatial Perception with Bilateral Bone Conduction.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xikun Lu; Jinqiu Sang; Juanjuan Cai; Chengshi Zheng
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on Perception of Bone Conducted Sound.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Stefan Stenfelt; Shengjian Wu; Zhihao Yan; Jinqiu Sang; Chengshi Zheng; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.