Literature DB >> 22193619

Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position.

Stefan Stenfelt1.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted (BC) sound depends on the stimulation position and the stimulation frequency.
BACKGROUND: Subjective transcranial attenuation of BC sound has previously only been measured at a few audiometric frequencies and with the stimulation at the mastoid. The results reported are on average of 5 to 10 dB with large intersubject variability and inconsistent with results obtained using vibration measurements of the cochlea.
METHODS: Pure tone hearing thresholds were measured in 28 unilateral deaf subjects at 31 frequencies between 0.25 and 8 kHz. The stimulation was provided at 4 positions: ipsilateral and contralateral mastoid, and ipsilateral and contralateral position for a bone conduction hearing aid.
RESULTS: With stimulation at the mastoid, the median transcranial attenuation is 3 to 5 dB at frequencies up to 0.5 kHz; between 0.5 and 1.8 kHz, it is close to 0 dB. The attenuation increases at higher frequencies; it is close to 10 dB at 3 to 5 kHz and becomes slightly less at the highest frequencies measured (4 dB at 8 kHz). When measured at the bone conduction hearing aid position, the median transcranial attenuation is 2 to 3 dB lower than at the mastoid. The intersubject variability is large at each frequency (around 40 dB), but there are small differences in general trends of the transcranial attenuation between individuals.
CONCLUSION: The median transcranial attenuation depends on stimulation position and frequency. However, the variability is great, both between individuals and within subjects for adjacent frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22193619     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823e28ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Intracochlear Measurements of Interaural Time and Level Differences Conveyed by Bilateral Bone Conduction Systems.

Authors:  Nyssa F Farrell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-12

4.  Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.

Authors:  Sébastien Schmerber; O Deguine; M Marx; P Van de Heyning; O Sterkers; I Mosnier; P Garin; B Godey; C Vincent; F Venail; M Mondain; A Deveze; J P Lavieille; A Karkas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.

Authors:  Hillary A Snapp; Michael E Hoffer; Xuezhong Liu; Suhrud M Rajguru
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Bone Anchored Hearing Aids for the Treatment of Asymmetric Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Luca Bruschini; Rachele Canelli; Andrea Morandi; Christina Cambi; Giacomo Fiacchini; Stefano Berrettini; Francesca Forli
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant.

Authors:  K Vogt; H Frenzel; S A Ausili; D Hollfelder; B Wollenberg; A F M Snik; M J H Agterberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of Skin Thickness on Cochlear Input Signal Using Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.