Literature DB >> 28189837

Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.

Nathaniel T Greene1, Herman A Jenkins2, Daniel J Tollin3, James R Easter4.   

Abstract

The stapes is held in the oval window by the stapedial annular ligament (SAL), which restricts total peak-to-peak displacement of the stapes. Previous studies have suggested that for moderate (<130 dB SPL) sound levels intracochlear pressure (PIC), measured at the base of the cochlea far from the basilar membrane, increases directly proportionally with stapes displacement (DStap), thus a current model of impulse noise exposure (the Auditory Hazard Assessment Algorithm for Humans, or AHAAH) predicts that peak PIC will vary linearly with DStap up to some saturation point. However, no direct tests of DStap, or of the relationship with PIC during such motion, have been performed during acoustic stimulation of the human ear. In order to examine the relationship between DStap and PIC to very high level sounds, measurements of DStap and PIC were made in cadaveric human temporal bones. Specimens were prepared by mastoidectomy and extended facial recess to expose the ossicular chain. Measurements of PIC were made in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST), along with the SPL in the external auditory canal (PEAC), concurrently with laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) measurements of stapes velocity (VStap). Stimuli were moderate (∼100 dB SPL) to very high level (up to ∼170 dB SPL), low frequency tones (20-2560 Hz). Both DStap and PSV increased proportionally with sound pressure level in the ear canal up to approximately ∼150 dB SPL, above which both DStap and PSV showed a distinct deviation from proportionality with PEAC. Both DStap and PSV approached saturation: DStap at a value exceeding 150 μm, which is substantially higher than has been reported for small mammals, while PSV showed substantial frequency dependence in the saturation point. The relationship between PSV and DStap remained constant, and cochlear input impedance did not vary across the levels tested, consistent with prior measurements at lower sound levels. These results suggest that PSV sound pressure holds constant relationship with DStap, described by the cochlear input impedance, at these, but perhaps not higher, stimulation levels. Additionally, these results indicate that the AHAAH model, which was developed using results from small animals, underestimates the sound pressure levels in the cochlea in response to high level sound stimulation, and must be revised.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High level sound; Intracochlear pressure; Laser Doppler vibrometry; Stapedial annular ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189837      PMCID: PMC5759762          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Naohito Hato; Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Kanthaiah Koka; Arnaud Deveze; N Julian Holland; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Contribution of the incudo-malleolar joint to middle-ear sound transmission.

Authors:  Rahel Gerig; Sebastian Ihrle; Christof Röösli; Adrian Dalbert; Ivo Dobrev; Flurin Pfiffner; Albrecht Eiber; Alexander M Huber; Jae Hoon Sim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Techniques to improve the efficiency of a middle ear implant: effect of different methods of coupling to the ossicular chain.

Authors:  Arnaud Devèze; Kanthaiah Koka; Stéphane Tringali; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Near-field shock formation in noise propagation from a high-power jet aircraft.

Authors:  Kent L Gee; Tracianne B Neilsen; J Micah Downing; Michael M James; Richard L McKinley; Robert C McKinley; Alan T Wall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Upper limit to stapes displacement: implications for hearing loss.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of Skin Thickness on Cochlear Input Signal Using Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; Saumil N Merchant; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Mohamed A Alhussaini; James R Easter; Theodore F Argo; Tim Walilko; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Limitations of present models of blast-induced sound power conduction through the external and middle ear.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Aaron K Remenschneider; Jeffrey Tao Cheng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Superior Canal Dehiscence Similarly Affects Cochlear Pressures in Temporal Bones and Audiograms in Patients.

Authors:  Y Song Cheng; Stefan Raufer; Xiying Guan; Christopher F Halpin; Daniel J Lee; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Intracochlear Pressures in Simulated Otitis Media With Effusion: A Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alhussaini; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins; Nathaniel T Greene
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  A Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction Implant.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass; Nathaniel T Greene
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The onset of nonlinear growth of middle-ear responses to high intensity sounds.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Iman Ghanad; Aaron Remenschneider; John Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.672

8.  The Impact of Location and Device Coupling on the Performance of the Osia System Actuator.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Charlotte Borgers; Tristan Putzeys; Joris Walraevens; Astrid Van Wieringen; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Human ossicular-joint flexibility transforms the peak amplitude and width of impulsive acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Peter K Gottlieb; Yona Vaisbuch; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.