Literature DB >> 22246385

Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

Catharina A J Dun1, Hubert T Faber, Maarten J F de Wolf, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Cor W R J Cremers, Myrthe K S Hol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses soft tissue reactions and implant stability of 1,132 percutaneous titanium implants (970 patients) for bone conduction devices (BCDs). In addition, it examines BCD usage and comparisons between different patient groups. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective survey. Mean follow-up time of 4.6 years.
SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: The surveyed cohort was divided into 3 different age groups (children, adults, and the elderly). In addition, 4 groups with variable loading times (i.e., the time between placement of the implant and loading the BCD sound processor) were identified as well as a subgroup of patients with mental retardation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Soft tissue reactions around the percutaneous implants as classified by the Holgers grading system, implant failure, and revision surgery rates.
RESULTS: In 95.5% of the 7,415 observations of 1,132 implants, there were no adverse soft tissue reactions. Implant loss was 8.3%. Significantly more soft tissue reactions and implant failures were observed in children compared with adults and the elderly (p < 0.05). Implant survival was lower in patients with mental retardation compared with patients without mental retardation (p = 0.001). The loading time did not influence the occurrence of soft tissue reactions and implant survival rates.
CONCLUSION: Children and patients with mental retardation are the most vulnerable to soft tissue reactions and implant losses. Additional and more frequent care needs to be given during outpatient consultations. Because loading as early as 3 to 5 weeks did not negatively affect skin reactions or implant survival, full BCD installation can occur earlier without risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246385     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  47 in total

1.  Bone Conduction Implants for Hearing Rehabilitation in Skull Base Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Lauren Placke; Eric N Appelbaum; Akash J Patel; Alex D Sweeney
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-06

2.  Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Kirsten Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [An alternative to percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems].

Authors:  S Arndt; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Nonsurgical Management of Single-Sided Deafness: Contralateral Routing of Signal.

Authors:  Hillary Snapp
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-17

Review 5.  Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.

Authors:  Qianyu Xiao; Fanghua Gong; Ning Wang; Weihua Hu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience.

Authors:  Antonio Caruso; Anna Lisa Giannuzzi; Valerio Sozzi; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.

Authors:  Sébastien Schmerber; O Deguine; M Marx; P Van de Heyning; O Sterkers; I Mosnier; P Garin; B Godey; C Vincent; F Venail; M Mondain; A Deveze; J P Lavieille; A Karkas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Sophono Alpha System and subtotal petrosectomy with external auditory canal blind sac closure.

Authors:  Giuseppe Magliulo; Rosaria Turchetta; Giannicola Iannella; Riccardo Valperga di Masino; Riccardo Valpega di Masino; Marco de Vincentiis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.

Authors:  F DI Giustino; P Vannucchi; R Pecci; A Mengucci; R Santimone; B Giannoni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Henricus P M Kunst; Ronald J E Pennings; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.