Literature DB >> 27753703

Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.

Nathaniel T Greene1, Jameson K Mattingly, Renee M Banakis Hartl, Daniel J Tollin, Stephen P Cass.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion into the round window induces pressure transients in the cochlear fluid comparable to high-intensity sound transients.
BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving a CI have some remaining functional hearing at low frequencies; thus, devices and surgical techniques have been developed to use this residual hearing. To maintain functional acoustic hearing, it is important to retain function of any hair cells and auditory nerve fibers innervating the basilar membrane; however, in a subset of patients, residual low-frequency hearing is lost after CI insertion. Here, we test the hypothesis that transient intracochlear pressure spikes are generated during CI electrode insertion, which could cause damage and compromise residual hearing.
METHODS: Human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared with an extended facial recess. Pressures in the scala vestibuli and tympani were measured with fiber-optic pressure sensors inserted into the cochlea near the oval and round windows, whereas CI electrodes (five styles from two manufacturers) were inserted into the cochlea via a round window approach.
RESULTS: Pressures in the scala tympani tended to be larger in magnitude than pressures in the scala vestibuli, consistent with electrode insertion into the scala tympani. CI electrode insertion produced a range of pressure transients in the cochlea that could occur alone or as part of a train of spikes with equivalent peak sound pressure levels in excess of 170 dB sound pressure level. Instances of pressure transients varied with electrode styles.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest electrode design, insertion mechanism, and surgical technique affect the magnitude and rate of intracochlear pressure transients during CI electrode insertion. Pressure transients showed intensities similar to those elicited by high-level sounds and thus could cause damage to the basilar membrane and/or hair cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27753703      PMCID: PMC5104176          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  42 in total

1.  Different forms of dizziness occurring after cochlear implant.

Authors:  T Kubo; K Yamamoto; T Iwaki; K Doi; M Tamura
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effects of Different Insertion Techniques of a Cochlear Implant Electrode on the Intracochlear Pressure.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Arneborg Ernst; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Round window membrane motion with air conduction and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Kanthaiah Koka; Arnaud Deveze; N Julian Holland; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Functional patency of the cochlear aqueduct.

Authors:  B Carlborg; B Densert; O Densert
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Effects of Skin Thickness on Cochlear Input Signal Using Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Impulse noise and neurosensory hearing loss. Relationship to small arms fire.

Authors:  R J Keim
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1970-09

9.  Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Usami; Hideaki Moteki; Nobuyoshi Suzuki; Hisakuni Fukuoka; Maiko Miyagawa; Shin-Ya Nishio; Yutaka Takumi; Satoshi Iwasaki; Claude Jolly
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Intracochlear fluid pressure changes related to the insertional speed of a CI electrode.

Authors:  I Todt; P Mittmann; A Ernst
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  13 in total

1.  Lateral Semicircular Canal Pressures During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: a Possible Mechanism for Postoperative Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Stephanie Gogel; Tanya Van Voorst; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Outlook and future of inner ear therapy.

Authors:  Jenna Devare; Samuel Gubbels; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Christopher Kaufmann; Marlan R Hansen; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Intracochlear Pressures in Simulated Otitis Media With Effusion: A Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alhussaini; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins; Nathaniel T Greene
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Semicircular Canal Pressure Changes During High-intensity Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Anne K Maxwell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Victor Benichoux; Jameson K Mattingly; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction Implant.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass; Nathaniel T Greene
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Human ossicular-joint flexibility transforms the peak amplitude and width of impulsive acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Peter K Gottlieb; Yona Vaisbuch; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.