Literature DB >> 2616138

Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions.

P R Herse1, H E Bedell.   

Abstract

Measurement of visual acuity for letters of different contrasts has been suggested as a clinical way to evaluate contrast sensitivity in patients with vision abnormalities. If variable-contrast letter acuity provides information similar to the contrast sensitivity function (CSF), then comparable effects should be seen in stimulus manipulations which simulate decreased vision. Using both our own and published data, we compared the effects of diffusive blur, dioptric blur, and eccentric viewing on contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets. A diffuser placed close to the eye reduces contrast sensitivity fairly evenly across all spatial frequencies, with similar results for letters and gratings. However, dioptric blur reduces sensitivity substantially more to letters than to comparably fine gratings. Eccentric viewing also produces a larger sensitivity loss for letters than for gratings. Because some stimulus manipulations produce dissimilar changes in contrast sensitivity for letters and gratings, it is questionable whether the results of one measure can be used to draw inferences about the other. It is proposed that local or relative phase discrimination has an important role in explaining the different responses to letter and grating targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2616138     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198911000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Vision with bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses].

Authors:  K Kirschfeld; M F Land
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Samuel H Jarvis; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Evaluation of a new E-optotype chart for measuring contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  G P Paliaga; M Braga; M Criscito
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Pamela Jeter; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The main sequence of saccades optimizes speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Christopher M Harris; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.