Literature DB >> 22130683

[Vision with bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses].

K Kirschfeld1, M F Land.   

Abstract

Bifocal or multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) can be used to replace natural lenses during cataract surgery. These lenses are recommended by cataract surgeons as the replacement lenses of choice when patients wish to avoid wearing spectacles. There are, however, drawbacks to these lenses: one drawback is that the contrast in the images of bifocal and multifocal lenses is reduced as documented in the ophthalmology literature. It is claimed that acuity is similar in multifocal compared to monofocal lenses, however, we show that any loss in contrast inevitably reduces visual acuity. The other drawback is that the sharp in-focus image is always seen superimposed on one or more blurred out of focus images of the same object. In the ophthalmology literature it is assumed that the brain can suppress the undesired blurred image and only perceive the sharp image. We argue that there are no known mechanisms that would make this possible. This means that vision with bifocal or multifocal implanted lenses cannot be as good as vision with monofocal implants supplemented by spectacles, and this should be explained to patients before undergoing surgery for lens replacement. The results also hold for bifocal and multifocal contact lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130683     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2462-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  22 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Enzo Maria Vingolo; PierLuigi Grenga; Luca Iacobelli; Roberto Grenga
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Contact lens correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Edward S Bennett
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J T Holladay; H Van Dijk; A Lang; V Portney; T R Willis; R Sun; H C Oksman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions.

Authors:  P R Herse; H E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Roberto Bellucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Intraocular lenses: complications and visual results.

Authors:  W J Stark; A E Maumenee; M Datiles; W Fagadau; C C Baker; D Worthen; C Auer; P Klein; E McGhee; M E Jacobs
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1983

8.  A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  R F Steinert; C T Post; S F Brint; C D Fritch; D L Hall; L W Wilder; I H Fine; S B Lichtenstein; S Masket; C Casebeer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjan D Nijkamp; Maria G T Dolders; John de Brabander; Bart van den Borne; Fred Hendrikse; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn; J L Schnapf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.