Literature DB >> 26148575

Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.

Sami P Väänänen1, Lorenzo Grassi2, Gunnar Flivik3, Jukka S Jurvelin4, Hanna Isaksson5.   

Abstract

Areal bone mineral density (aBMD), as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), predicts hip fracture risk only moderately. Simulation of bone mechanics based on DXA imaging of the proximal femur, may help to improve the prediction accuracy. Therefore, we collected three (1-3) image sets, including CT images and DXA images of 34 proximal cadaver femurs (set 1, including 30 males, 4 females), 35 clinical patient CT images of the hip (set 2, including 27 males, 8 females) and both CT and DXA images of clinical patients (set 3, including 12 female patients). All CT images were segmented manually and landmarks were placed on both femurs and pelvises. Two separate statistical appearance models (SAMs) were built using the CT images of the femurs and pelvises in sets 1 and 2, respectively. The 3D shape of the femur was reconstructed from the DXA image by matching the SAMs with the DXA images. The orientation and modes of variation of the SAMs were adjusted to minimize the sum of the absolute differences between the projection of the SAMs and a DXA image. The mesh quality and the location of the SAMs with respect to the manually placed control points on the DXA image were used as additional constraints. Then, finite element (FE) models were built from the reconstructed shapes. Mean point-to-surface distance between the reconstructed shape and CT image was 1.0 mm for cadaver femurs in set 1 (leave-one-out test) and 1.4 mm for clinical subjects in set 3. The reconstructed volumetric BMD showed a mean absolute difference of 140 and 185 mg/cm(3) for set 1 and set 3 respectively. The generation of the SAM and the limitation of using only one 2D image were found to be the most significant sources of errors in the shape reconstruction. The noise in the DXA images had only small effect on the accuracy of the shape reconstruction. DXA-based FE simulation was able to explain 85% of the CT-predicted strength of the femur in stance loading. The present method can be used to accurately reconstruct the 3D shape and internal density of the femur from 2D DXA images. This may help to derive new information from clinical DXA images by producing patient-specific FE models for mechanical simulation of femoral bone mechanics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; DXA; Finite element; Proximal femur; Shape reconstruction; Statistical appearance model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26148575     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Update on Imaging-Based Measurement of Bone Mineral Density and Quality.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Galateia Kazakia
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Analysis of the evolution of cortical and trabecular bone compartments in the proximal femur after spinal cord injury by 3D-DXA.

Authors:  L Gifre; L Humbert; A Muxi; L Del Rio; J Vidal; E Portell; A Monegal; N Guañabens; P Peris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effects of osteoporosis drug treatments on cortical and trabecular bone in the femur using DXA-based 3D modeling.

Authors:  R Winzenrieth; L Humbert; S Di Gregorio; E Bonel; M García; L Del Rio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Paraspinal Muscle Fat Infiltration Based on QCT: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Xiangwen Li; Yuyang Zhang; Yuxue Xie; Rong Lu; Hongyue Tao; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; R Winzenrieth; J Tamaki; Y Sato; N Dongmei; E Kajita; K Kouda; A Yura; T Tachiki; K Kamiya; S Kagamimori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  L Yang; N Parimi; E S Orwoll; D M Black; J T Schousboe; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Advanced 2D image processing technique to predict hip fracture risk in an older population based on single DXA scans.

Authors:  F Jazinizadeh; J D Adachi; C E Quenneville
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.