M Iki1, R Winzenrieth2, J Tamaki3, Y Sato4, N Dongmei5, E Kajita6, K Kouda7, A Yura8, T Tachiki6, K Kamiya3, S Kagamimori9. 1. Department of Public Health, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Oono-higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. masa@med.kindai.ac.jp. 2. 3D-SHAPER Medical SL, Carrer de París, 179 2° 2ª, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. 4. Department of Human Life, Jin-ai University, 3-1-1 Otemachi, Echizen, Fukui, 915-8586, Japan. 5. Department of Orthopedics Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, No.1 Yingfang Road, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010030, China. 6. Chukyo Gakuin University Faculty of Nursing, 2216 Tokicho, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6192, Japan. 7. Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shin-machi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. 8. Department of Public Health, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Oono-higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. 9. University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Abstract
Areal BMD (aBMD) from DXA is not a sufficiently accurate predictor of fracture. Novel volumetric BMD derived from 3D modeling of the hip from DXA images significantly improved the predictive ability for hip fracture relative to aBMD at the femoral neck, but not aBMD at the total hip. INTRODUCTION: To clarify whether volumetric and geometric indices derived from novel three-dimensional (3D) modeling of the hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric (DXA) images improve hip fracture prediction relative to areal bone mineral density (aBMD). METHODS: We examined 1331 women who had completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey over 20 years (age 40-79 years at baseline). Each survey included aBMD measurement at the hip by DXA. Volumetric and geometric indices of the hip at baseline and the 10-year follow-up were estimated from DXA images using a 3D modeling algorithm. Incident hip fractures during the 20-year follow-up period were identified through self-report. Cox proportional hazards regression models allowing for repeated measurements of predictors and outcomes were constructed, and their predictive ability for hip fracture was evaluated using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) over aBMD at the femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) as references. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 19.8 years, 68 incident hip fractures were identified (2.22/1000 person-years). A significantly larger AUC of trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the total hip (AUC = 0.741), femoral neck (AUC = 0.748), and intertrochanter (AUC = 0.738) and significant NRI (0.177, 0.149, and 0.195, respectively) were observed compared with FN-aBMD (AUC = 0.701), but not TH-aBMD. CONCLUSIONS: vBMD obtained from 3D modeling using routinely obtained hip DXA images significantly improved hip fracture risk prediction over conventional FN-aBMD, but not TH-aBMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study was retrospectively registered as UMIN000032869 in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on July 1, 2018.
Areal BMD (aBMD) from DXA is not a sufficiently accurate predictor of fracture. Novel volumetric BMD derived from 3D modeling of the hip from DXA images significantly improved the predictive ability for hip fracture relative to aBMD at the femoral neck, but not aBMD at the total hip. INTRODUCTION: To clarify whether volumetric and geometric indices derived from novel three-dimensional (3D) modeling of the hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric (DXA) images improve hip fracture prediction relative to areal bone mineral density (aBMD). METHODS: We examined 1331 women who had completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey over 20 years (age 40-79 years at baseline). Each survey included aBMD measurement at the hip by DXA. Volumetric and geometric indices of the hip at baseline and the 10-year follow-up were estimated from DXA images using a 3D modeling algorithm. Incident hip fractures during the 20-year follow-up period were identified through self-report. Cox proportional hazards regression models allowing for repeated measurements of predictors and outcomes were constructed, and their predictive ability for hip fracture was evaluated using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) over aBMD at the femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) as references. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 19.8 years, 68 incident hip fractures were identified (2.22/1000 person-years). A significantly larger AUC of trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the total hip (AUC = 0.741), femoral neck (AUC = 0.748), and intertrochanter (AUC = 0.738) and significant NRI (0.177, 0.149, and 0.195, respectively) were observed compared with FN-aBMD (AUC = 0.701), but not TH-aBMD. CONCLUSIONS: vBMD obtained from 3D modeling using routinely obtained hipDXA images significantly improved hip fracture risk prediction over conventional FN-aBMD, but not TH-aBMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study was retrospectively registered as UMIN000032869 in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on July 1, 2018.
Entities:
Keywords:
Areal bone mineral density; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Fracture risk assessment; Hip fracture; Three-dimensional modeling; Volumetric bone mineral density
Authors: Jordi Clotet; Yves Martelli; Silvana Di Gregorio; Luis Miguel Del Río Barquero; Ludovic Humbert Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Ludovic Humbert; Yves Martelli; Roger Fonolla; Martin Steghofer; Silvana Di Gregorio; Jorge Malouf; Jordi Romera; Luis Miguel Del Rio Barquero Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sami P Väänänen; Lorenzo Grassi; Gunnar Flivik; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hanna Isaksson Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J Tamaki; K Fujimori; S Ikehara; K Kamiya; S Nakatoh; N Okimoto; S Ogawa; S Ishii; M Iki Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 6.741