Literature DB >> 32270332

Update on Imaging-Based Measurement of Bone Mineral Density and Quality.

Thomas M Link1, Galateia Kazakia2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with inflammatory arthropathies have a high rate of fragility fractures. Diagnostic assessment and monitoring of bone density and quality are therefore critically important. Here, we review standard and advanced techniques to measure bone density and quality, specifically focusing on patients with inflammatory arthropathies. RECENT
FINDINGS: Current standard procedures are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). DXA-based newer methods include trabecular bone score (TBS) and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). More advanced imaging methods to measure bone quality include high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) as well as multi-detector CT (MD-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Quantitative ultrasound has shown promise but is not standard to assess bone fragility. While there are limitations, DXA remains the standard technique to measure density in patients with rheumatological disorders. Newer modalities to measure bone quality may allow better characterization of bone fragility but currently are not standard of care procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone fragility; Bone mineral density; Bone quality; DXA; Inflammatory arthropathies; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32270332      PMCID: PMC7875476          DOI: 10.1007/s11926-020-00892-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3774            Impact factor:   4.592


  101 in total

1.  Structure analysis of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal femur: in vitro correlation with biomechanical strength and BMD.

Authors:  T M Link; V Vieth; R Langenberg; N Meier; A Lotter; D Newitt; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Screening: Assessing bone structure in the prediction of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Trabecular bone score (TBS): available knowledge, clinical relevance, and future prospects.

Authors:  V Bousson; C Bergot; B Sutter; P Levitz; B Cortet
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Kyoji Ikeda; Masahiko Nishiguchi; Hiroyuki Shindo; Masataka Uetani; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Detection of Atypical Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Angela M Cheung; Malachi J McKenna; Denise M van de Laarschot; M Carola Zillikens; Valerie Peck; Jeevitha Srighanthan; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  In vivo comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance image analysis of the distal radius in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Cortet; N Boutry; P Dubois; P Bourel; A Cotten; X Marchandise
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The association between prevalent vertebral fractures and bone quality of the distal radius and distal tibia as measured with HR-pQCT in postmenopausal women with a recent non-vertebral fracture at the Fracture Liaison Service.

Authors:  L Vranken; C E Wyers; B van Rietbergen; J H M Driessen; P P M M Geusens; H M J Janzing; R Y van der Velde; J P W van den Bergh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone fracture risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  A-Li Xue; Su-Ye Wu; Lei Jiang; Ai-Mei Feng; Hai-Fei Guo; Pu Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluations of daily teriparatide using finite-element analysis over 12 months in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Kumiko Ono; Satoru Ohashi; Hiroyuki Oka; Yuho Kadono; Tetsuro Yasui; Takumi Matsumoto; Yasunori Omata; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Evaluation of the bone mineral density in the Mexican female population using the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology.

Authors:  Rosales-Ortiz Sergio; Rivera García Elaín Nayelli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Similarities and Differences in Bone Mineral Density between Multiple Sites in the Same Individual: An Elderly Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Keita Nishi; Daisuke Endo; Takashi Hasegawa; Takefumi Moriuchi; Keiko Ogami-Takamura; Kazunobu Saiki; Kiyohito Murai; Toshio Higashi; Toshiyuki Tsurumoto; Yoshitaka Manabe; Joichi Oyamada
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Revisiting the radiographic assessment of osteoporosis-Osteopenia in children 0-2 years of age. A systematic review.

Authors:  Karen Rosendahl; Anette Lundestad; John Asle Bjørlykke; Regina Küfner Lein; Oskar Angenete; Thomas Angell Augdal; Lil-Sofie Ording Müller; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  MR-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of the vertebral bone marrow differentiates between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  F T Gassert; A Kufner; F G Gassert; Y Leonhardt; S Kronthaler; B J Schwaiger; C Boehm; M R Makowski; J S Kirschke; T Baum; D C Karampinos; A S Gersing
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The Relationship between Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of Female Workers in A Unit of Tai'an.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Siqi Wang; Zhengxiu Chen; Zhangshen Ran
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Finite Element Analysis of Osteoporotic and Osteoblastic Vertebrae and Its Association With the Proton Density Fat Fraction From Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI - A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Tobias Greve; Nithin Manohar Rayudu; Michael Dieckmeyer; Christof Boehm; Stefan Ruschke; Egon Burian; Christopher Kloth; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Nico Sollmann
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD) for diagnosis of osteoporosis - experimental data from artificial vertebrae confirms significant dependence on bone size.

Authors:  Paul Henry Golding
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-07-25

9.  Texture Analysis Using CT and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI Can Improve Differentiation Between Patients With and Without Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Edoardo A Becherucci; Christof Boehm; Malek El Husseini; Stefan Ruschke; Egon Burian; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas M Link; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum; Michael Dieckmeyer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.