Literature DB >> 32415372

Advanced 2D image processing technique to predict hip fracture risk in an older population based on single DXA scans.

F Jazinizadeh1, J D Adachi2, C E Quenneville3,4.   

Abstract

A new technique to enhance hip fracture risk prediction in older adults was presented and assessed. The new method dramatically improved prediction at high specificity levels using only a standard clinical diagnostic scan. This has the potential to be implemented in clinical practice to enhance patient fragility diagnosis.
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. However, studies have shown this to be insufficient to accurately predict hip fractures. Therefore, complementary methods are needed to enhance hip fracture risk prediction to identify vulnerable patients.
METHODS: Hip DXA scans were obtained for 192 subjects from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), 50 of whom had experienced a hip fracture within 5 years of the scan. 2D statistical shape and appearance modeling was performed to account for the effect of the femur's geometry and BMD distribution on hip fracture risk. Statistical shape modeling (SSM), and statistical appearance modeling (SAM) were also used separately to predict the fracture risk based solely on the femur's geometry and BMD distribution, respectively. Combined with BMD, age, and body mass index (BMI), logistic regression was performed to estimate the fracture risk over the 5-year period.
RESULTS: Using the new technique, hip fractures were correctly predicted in 78% of cases compared with 36% when using the T-score. The accuracy of the prediction was not greatly reduced when using SSM and SAM (78% and 74% correct, respectively). Various geometric and BMD distribution traits were identified in the fractured and non-fractured groups.
CONCLUSION: 2D SSAM can dramatically improve hip fracture prediction at high specificity levels and estimate the year of the impending fracture using standard clinical images. This has the potential to be implemented in clinical practice to estimate hip fracture risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA scan; Hip fracture risk; Image processing; Statistical shape and appearance modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32415372     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05444-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  34 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Experimental neuropathy in rats made diabetic with alloxan.

Authors:  R E Lovelace
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-10

Review 3.  An overview and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tümay Sözen; Lale Özışık; Nursel Çalık Başaran
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 4.  Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Nananda F Col; John B Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Long-term mortality following fractures at different skeletal sites: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  L J Melton; S J Achenbach; E J Atkinson; T M Therneau; S Amin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cynthia L Leibson; Anna N A Tosteson; Sherine E Gabriel; Jeanine E Ransom; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  An approach to identifying osteopenic women at increased short-term risk of fracture.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Suna Barlas; Susan K Brenneman; Thomas A Abbott; Ya-Ting Chen; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

8.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

9.  The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders.

Authors:  Scott Schnell; Susan M Friedman; Daniel A Mendelson; Karilee W Bingham; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

Review 10.  A brief history of FRAX.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitating Age-Related BMD Textural Variation from DXA Region-Free-Analysis: A Study of Hip Fracture Prediction in Three Cohorts.

Authors:  Mohsen Farzi; Jose M Pozo; Eugene McCloskey; Richard Eastell; Nicholas C Harvey; Alejandro F Frangi; Jeremy Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 2.  Statistical Shape and Appearance Models: Development Towards Improved Osteoporosis Care.

Authors:  Lorenzo Grassi; Sami P Väänänen; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.096

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.