Literature DB >> 29974136

Effects of osteoporosis drug treatments on cortical and trabecular bone in the femur using DXA-based 3D modeling.

R Winzenrieth1,2, L Humbert3,4, S Di Gregorio4,5, E Bonel4,5, M García4,5, L Del Rio4,5.   

Abstract

Effects of osteoporosis drugs on proximal femur cortical and trabecular bone were studied using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based 3D modeling method. Changes observed in this head-to-head study were consistent with those obtained using computed tomography in the literature.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of osteoporosis drugs on cortical and trabecular bone at the proximal femur using DXA-based 3D modeling.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 155 patients stratified by treatments: naive of treatment (NAIVE), alendronate (AL), denosumab (DMAB), and teriparatide (TPTD). DXA scans were performed at baseline and after treatment, and areal bone mineral density at spine and femur were measured. A software algorithm (3D-SHAPER) was used to derive 3D models from hip DXA scans and compute: trabecular and cortical volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical thickness (Cth), and cortical surface BMD (cortical sBMD). Changes from baseline were normalized at 24 months and evaluated in terms or percentage.
RESULTS: After 24 months, a non-significant decrease was observed for trabecular vBMD, Cortical sBMD, Cth, and cortical vBMD (- 2.3, - 0.8, - 0.3, and - 0.5%) in the NAIVE group. Under AL and DMAB, significant increases were observed in trabecular vBMD (3.8 and 7.3%), cortical vBMD (1.4 and 2.0%), and cortical sBMD (1.5 and 3.6%). An increase in Cth was observed in patients under DMAB (1.8%). Under TPTD, a significant increase in Trabecular vBMD was observed (5.9%) associated with a non-significant increase of Cth (+ 1%) concomitant with a decrease in cortical vBMD (- 1.1%).
CONCLUSION: Results obtained in this head-to-head study are consistent with those obtained using computed tomography in the literature. DXA-based modeling techniques could complement standard DXA examination to monitor treatment effects on trabecular and cortical compartments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D modeling; Cortical and trabecular bones; DXA; Femur; Osteoporosis treatments

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29974136     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4624-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  45 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 diabetes and bone fractures.

Authors:  Kendall F Moseley
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 2.  Uses and limitations of bone mineral density measurements in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ralph E Small
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-05-09

3.  Structural Parameters of the Proximal Femur by 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Software: Comparison With Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jordi Clotet; Yves Martelli; Silvana Di Gregorio; Luis Miguel Del Río Barquero; Ludovic Humbert
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  3D-DXA: Assessing the Femoral Shape, the Trabecular Macrostructure and the Cortex in 3D from DXA images.

Authors:  Ludovic Humbert; Yves Martelli; Roger Fonolla; Martin Steghofer; Silvana Di Gregorio; Jorge Malouf; Jordi Romera; Luis Miguel Del Rio Barquero
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology.

Authors:  Philippe Zysset; Dieter Pahr; Klaus Engelke; Harry K Genant; Michael R McClung; David L Kendler; Christopher Recknor; Michael Kinzl; Jakob Schwiedrzik; Oleg Museyko; Andrea Wang; Cesar Libanati
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Microarchitectural deterioration of cortical and trabecular bone: differing effects of denosumab and alendronate.

Authors:  Ego Seeman; Pierre D Delmas; David A Hanley; Deborah Sellmeyer; Angela M Cheung; Elizabeth Shane; Ann Kearns; Thierry Thomas; Steven K Boyd; Stephanie Boutroy; Cesar Bogado; Sharmila Majumdar; Michelle Fan; Cesar Libanati; Jose Zanchetta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).

Authors:  Valérie Danielle Bousson; Judith Adams; Klaus Engelke; Mounir Aout; Martine Cohen-Solal; Catherine Bergot; Didier Haguenauer; Daniele Goldberg; Karine Champion; Redha Aksouh; Eric Vicaut; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Denosumab rapidly increases cortical bone in key locations of the femur: a 3D bone mapping study in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Jacques P Brown; Michael R McClung; Andrea Wang; Cesar Libanati
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Skeletal disorders associated with the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor 1 axis.

Authors:  Gherardo Mazziotti; Andrea G Lania; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  High-Intensity Exercise and Geometric Indices of Hip Bone Strength in Postmenopausal Women on or off Bone Medication: The MEDEX-OP Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher; Jedidah S Yong; Benjamin K Weeks; Belinda R Beck
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the in-vivo assessment of bone strength: state of the art-outcomes of an expert consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Authors:  Nasser Al-Daghri; Jaime C Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Loredana Cavalli; Cyrus Cooper; Bernard Cortet; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Hans Peter Dimai; Stefano Gonnelli; Peyman Hadji; Philippe Halbout; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andreas Kurth; Medea Locquet; Stefania Maggi; Radmila Matijevic; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Thomas Thierry; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  3D DXA Hip Differences in Patients with Acromegaly or Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Authors:  Luis Gracia-Marco; Sheila Gonzalez-Salvatierra; Antonia Garcia-Martin; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Beatriz Garcia-Fontana; José Juan Gil-Cosano; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Analysis of the subsequent treatment of osteoporosis by transitioning from bisphosphonates to denosumab, using quantitative computed tomography: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Koki Tsuchiya; Koji Ishikawa; Yoshifumi Kudo; Soji Tani; Takashi Nagai; Tomoaki Toyone; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.