Literature DB >> 26141318

Patient Motivation, Satisfaction, and Coping in Genetic Counseling and Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

S Clark1, L G Bluman, N Borstelmann, K Regan, E P Winer, B K Rimer, C S Skinner.   

Abstract

Women with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer can now have genetic testing, that may identify mutations associated with increased cancer predisposition. Within the context of a clinical trial evaluating printed educational materials, we examined motivation, satisfaction, coping, and perceptions of genetic counseling and testing among 159 women who underwent pretest counseling and made a testing decision. Ninety-six percent of the participants elected to have BRCA1/2 testing. When making a decision about genetic testing, study participants were concerned less about the potential negative effects that could result from testing than the potential benefits. After counseling, participants said that they felt better able to make decisions that were right for them and that their questions and concerns were adequately addressed during the session. Ninety-five percent of the women were satisfied with their test decision. Participants used a range of strategies to cope with thoughts and feelings about cancer and/or genetic testing immediately following test decision. Results suggest that the genetic counseling session helped women make decisions about testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, even in the setting of a trial in which all women also received detailed educational materials. Further, the results indicate that future research focusing on perceptions of risks and benefits of testing and of coping strategies immediately following test decision may be warranted.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 26141318     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009463905057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ethical, social and counselling issues in hereditary cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  J E Garber; A F Patenaude
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1995

Review 2.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; M Daly; J Garber; J Botkin; M J Kahn; P Lynch; A McTiernan; K Offit; J Perlman; G Petersen; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history.

Authors:  D A Berry; G Parmigiani; J Sanchez; J Schildkraut; E Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.

Authors:  G Geller; J R Botkin; M J Green; N Press; B B Biesecker; B Wilfond; G Grana; M B Daly; K Schneider; M J Kahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  BRCA1--lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas.

Authors:  F S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  L G Bluman; B K Rimer; D A Berry; N Borstelmann; J D Iglehart; K Regan; J Schildkraut; E P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

Authors:  C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D T Bishop; D Ford; G P Crockford
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Developing intervention/prevention strategies for individuals at high risk of developing hereditary ovarian cancer.

Authors:  H H Gallion; R Park
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1995
View more
  13 in total

1.  The psychological dimension of informed consent: dissonance processes in genetic testing.

Authors:  Sonja Grover
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Exploring barriers to payer utilization of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Nan Doyle; Allison Cirino; Amber Trivedi; Maureen Flynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Carla L Fisher; Thomas Roccotagliata; Camella J Rising; David W Kissane; Emily A Glogowski; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Across the Spectrum: Case Studies in Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  T A DeMarco; B N Peshkin; B M Brogan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Experiences of Women Who Underwent Predictive BRCA 1/2 Mutation Testing Before the Age of 30.

Authors:  Kate Brunstrom; Alexandra Murray; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' preferences regarding counseling at the time of infants' sweat test.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Rebecca L Koscik; Peggy Modaff; Darci Pfeil; Michael J Rock; Philip M Farrell; Caroline Lifchez; Mary Ellen Freeman; William Gershan; Christina Zaleski; Bradley Sullivan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Issues Arising in Psychological Consultations to Help Parents Talk to Minor and Young Adult Children about their Cancer Genetic Test Result: a Guide to Providers.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Topics and sources of memorable breast cancer messages and their impact on prevention and detection behaviors.

Authors:  Sandi W Smith; Samantha Nazione; Carolyn Laplante; Michael R Kotowski; Charles Atkin; Christine M Skubisz; Cynthia Stohl
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009 Apr-May

10.  "I wouldn't classify myself as a patient": the importance of a "well-being" environment for individuals receiving counseling about familial cancer risk.

Authors:  Ceri Phelps; Debra Horrigan; Liwsi Kim Protheroe; Janina Hopkin; Wendy Jones; Alexandra Murray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.