Literature DB >> 9017003

Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history.

D A Berry1, G Parmigiani, J Sanchez, J Schildkraut, E Winer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heritable mutations of the breast cancer gene BRCA1 are rare, occurring in fewer than 1% of women in the general population, and therefore account for a small proportion of cases of breast and ovarian cancers. Nevertheless, the presence of such mutations is highly predictive of the development of these cancers.
PURPOSE: We developed and applied a mathematic model for calculating the probability that a woman with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer carries a mutation of BRCA1. METHODS AND
RESULTS: As a basis for the model, we use Mendelian genetics and apply Bayes' theorem to information on the family history of these diseases. Of importance are the exact relationships of all family members, including both affected and unaffected members, and ages at diagnosis of the affected members and current ages of the unaffected members. We used available estimates of BRCA1 mutation frequencies in the general population and age-specific incidence rates of breast and ovarian cancers in carriers and noncarriers of mutations to estimate the probability that a particular member of the family carries a mutation. This probability is based on cancer statuses of all first- and second-degree relatives. We first describe the model by considering single individuals: a woman diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer and also a woman free of cancer. We next considered two artificial and two actual family histories and addressed the sensitivity of our calculations to various assumptions. Particular relationships of family members with and without cancer can have a substantial impact on the probability of carrying a susceptibility gene. Ages at diagnosis of affected family members and their types of cancer are also important. A woman with two primary cancers can have a probability of carrying a mutation in excess of 80%, even with no other information about family history. The number and relationships of unaffected members, along with their current ages or ages at death, are critical determinants of one's carrier probability. An affected woman with several cancers in her family can have a probability of carrying a mutation that ranges from close to 100% to less than 5%.
CONCLUSION: Our model gives informative and specific probabilities that a particular woman carries a mutation. IMPLICATIONS: This model focuses on mutations in BRCA1 and assumes that all other breast cancer is sporadic. With the cloning of BRCA2, we now know that this assumption is incorrect. We have adjusted the model to include BRCA2, but the use of this version must await publication of penetrance data for BRCA2, including those for male breast cancer that are apparently associated with BRCA2 but not with BRCA1. The current model is, nevertheless, appropriate and useful. Of principal importance is its potential and that of improved versions for aiding women and their health care providers in assessing the need for genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9017003     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.3.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  86 in total

Review 1.  Why should primary care physicians know about breast cancer genetics?

Authors:  L E Pinsky; J B Culver; J Hull; E Levy-Lahad; M Daly; W Burke
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-09

2.  Genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alison P Klein
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  Linkage of a pedigree drawing program and database to a program for determining BRCA mutation carrier probability.

Authors:  Sharon R Sand; David S DeRam; Deborah J MacDonald; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  BayesMendel: an R environment for Mendelian risk prediction.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Wenyi Wang; Karl W Broman; Hormuzd A Katki; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-17

5.  Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials.

Authors:  Steven J Skates; Mark H Greene; Saundra S Buys; Phuong L Mai; Powel Brown; Marion Piedmonte; Gustavo Rodriguez; John O Schorge; Mark Sherman; Mary B Daly; Thomas Rutherford; Wendy R Brewster; David M O'Malley; Edward Partridge; John Boggess; Charles W Drescher; Claudine Isaacs; Andrew Berchuck; Susan Domchek; Susan A Davidson; Robert Edwards; Steven A Elg; Katie Wakeley; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Deborah Armstrong; Ira Horowitz; Carol J Fabian; Joan Walker; Patrick M Sluss; William Welch; Lori Minasian; Nora K Horick; Carol H Kasten; Susan Nayfield; David Alberts; Dianne M Finkelstein; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Estimation and interpretation of models of absolute risk from epidemiologic data, including family-based studies.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Interpreting trial results in light of conflicting evidence: a Bayesian analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Mithat Gönen; Thomas J Lynch; Thomas G Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Performance of Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Models in a Large Mammography Cohort.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Zoe Guan; Michaela Welch; Molly E Griffin; Dorothy A Sippo; Zhengyi Deng; Suzanne B Coopey; Ahmet Acar; Alan Semine; Giovanni Parmigiani; Danielle Braun; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Self administered screening for hereditary cancers in conjunction with mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  Charles H McDonnell; David J Seidenwurm; Diana E McDonnell; Kristie A Bobolis
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Joseph Vogelgesang; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.