Literature DB >> 25983051

Experiences of Women Who Underwent Predictive BRCA 1/2 Mutation Testing Before the Age of 30.

Kate Brunstrom1,2, Alexandra Murray3, Marion McAllister4.   

Abstract

This qualitative interview study focuses on the experiences of a sample of British female BRCA 1/2 carriers who had predictive testing before the age of 30, which is the minimum age for breast screening in the UK. Following appropriate informed consent procedures participants were recruited through the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales. Semi-structured interviews were conducted face-to-face with seven participants, transcribed in full and analyzed using thematic analysis. The motives for testing and perceived advantages described by participants were similar to those identified in previous studies with older participants, such as increased awareness and knowledge and feeling more in control. However some of the perceived disadvantages were specific to younger women, including feeling pressured to make important life decisions earlier than they would have liked, such as about family planning and risk reducing surgery. Participants also reported feeling abandoned or forgotten because of lack of ongoing clinical contact, or feeling "stuck waiting" for screening to begin. However, none felt that these disadvantages were a reason to regret having testing. Findings in this small study suggest that having BRCA 1/2 predictive testing can have positive outcomes for young women even though they may be unable to access interventions such as breast screening. However it may be helpful to encourage young women during pre-test counseling to explore the decisions and choices they may face. These young women could benefit from ongoing support and follow up and increased interaction with healthcare professionals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA 1/2 carriers; BRCA 1/2 genetic mutations; Genetic testing; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Predictive testing; United Kingdom; Young women

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25983051     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9845-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  41 in total

1.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Predictive testing of eighteen year olds: counseling challenges.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Elly Lynch; Lesley Spencer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Mary B Barton; Ann M Geiger; Lisa J Herrinton; Sharon J Rolnick; Emily L Harris; William E Barlow; Lisa M Reisch; Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

4.  The attitudes of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations toward clinical breast examinations and breast self-examinations.

Authors:  Tirtza N Spiegel; Kimberley A Hill; Ellen Warner
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Anticipatory loss and early mastectomy for young female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lindsey M Hoskins; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-08-27

8.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jeannie V Pasacreta
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Leveraging an Informatics Approach to Identify an Unmet Clinical Need for BRCA1/2 Testing Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Rebecca A Ottesen; Madeline Currey; Mihaela Cristea; Janet Nikowitz; Susan Shehayeb; Vanessa Lozano; Julie Hom; Julie Kilburn; Lisa N Lopez; Sam Wing; Ernesto Sosa; Jenny Shen; Michael Morris; Bedros Dilsizian; Thomas Joseph; James Shen; Camille Adeimy; Tanyanika Phillips; Bahareh Bahadini; Joyce C Niland
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-09

4.  COVID-19 Experiences Predicting High Anxiety and Depression Among a Sample of BRCA1/BRCA2-positive Women in the US.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2021-08-09

5.  Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

Authors:  Elvira D'Andrea; Tyra Lagerberg; Corrado De Vito; Erica Pitini; Carolina Marzuillo; Azzurra Massimi; Maria Rosaria Vacchio; Paola Grammatico; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Ringwald; Christina Wochnowski; Kristin Bosse; Katrin Elisabeth Giel; Norbert Schäffeler; Stephan Zipfel; Martin Teufel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: lessons from qualitative analysis of the screening experience.

Authors:  Sari Lieberman; Amnon Lahad; Ariela Tomer; Carmit Cohen; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Aviad Raz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Examining the uptake of predictive BRCA testing in the UK; findings and implications.

Authors:  Karen Lynn Greenhalgh; Munir Pirmohamed; Antony P Martin; Jennifer Downing; Brendan Collins; Brian Godman; Ana Alfirevic
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Should All Individuals Be Screened for Genetic Predisposition to Cancer?

Authors:  Sarah Wedderburn; Terri P McVeigh
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Using patient perspectives to inform communication training materials for health care professionals discussing BRCA mutation testing.

Authors:  Valerie Shilling; Susan Catt; Valerie Jenkins; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.