| Literature DB >> 26141175 |
Kimberly Kelly1, Howard Leventhal, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judy Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb.
Abstract
This repeated measures study examines (1) the change in subjective risk of mutations pre- to postcounseling, (2) the accuracy of BRCAPRO estimates of mutations, and (3) the discrepancy between subjective risk and BRCAPRO estimates of mutations before and after genetic counseling. Ninety-nine Ashkenazi Jewish individuals pursued testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Most had a personal cancer history (N = 51; family only: N = 48); and received uninformative negative results (N = 66; positives: N = 23; informative negative: N = 10). The coping strategy of defensive pessimism predicts that individuals will believe the worst case scenario to better cope with a potential negative outcome. Consistent with this, most felt they would have a mutation, if not mutations in both genes. The BRCAPRO model appeared to overestimate risk of having a mutation in this sample (p < .001). BRCAPRO overestimates notwithstanding, genetic counseling increased accuracy of subjective risk (p < .01). Individuals with a family-only cancer history had the least accurate estimates of risk (p < .05) and may need further intervention to either manage anxiety or improve knowledge.Entities:
Year: 2003 PMID: 26141175 DOI: 10.1023/A:1023905106360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Couns ISSN: 1059-7700 Impact factor: 2.537