Literature DB >> 15604634

The decision to test in women receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Kimberly Kelly1, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judie Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb.   

Abstract

Functions of genetic counseling include provision of risk information and provision of support in an effort to assist with decision making. This study examines (1) the relationship among intentions to test, self-reported provision of blood sample, and receipt of test results; (2) the impact of genetic counseling on distress specific to gene status, perceived risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer in the context having BRCA1/2 mutations (mutations predisposing to increased risk of breast-ovarian cancer), and perceived risk factors for breast cancer; and (3) the clinical profile of those receiving/not receiving results. Intentions to test for BRCA1/2 mutations, self-reported provision of blood sample immediately after counseling, and receipt of test results were statistically different but highly correlated, and intentions to test increased from pre- to postcounseling. A repeated measures ANOVA found distress specific to gene status and perceived risk factors decreased from pre- to postcounseling. Further, two clinical profiles of consultands emerged: (1) those receiving results with change in intentions to test having lower levels of distress and (2) those not receiving results and those receiving results with no change in intentions to test with higher levels of distress. Our findings are consistent with the function of genetic counseling-to provide information and support to those with familial cancer, as well as to assist in decision making. The provision of support is important as distress specific to gene status may impede flexible decision making about genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604634     DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000027959.37096.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  37 in total

1.  Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Albarracín; B T Johnson; M Fishbein; P A Muellerleile
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Psychological impact of genetic counselling and testing in women previously diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Randall; P Butow; J Kirk; K Tucker
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.048

3.  Uptake of BRCA1 genetic testing in adult sisters and daughters of known mutation carriers in Norway.

Authors:  Trine Levin Bodd; Jon Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Childbearing, oral contraceptive use, and breast cancer.

Authors:  V Beral; G Reeves
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Recommendation recall and satisfaction after attending breast/ovarian cancer risk counseling.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Lizbeth A Hoke; Rosemary B Duda; Nadine M Tung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing.

Authors:  Wendy McKinnon; Shelly Naud; Taka Ashikaga; Rose Colletti; Marie Wood
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Health behaviors among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Jackie Quach; Kyle Porter; Howard Leventhal; Kimberly M Kelly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Parul Agarwal; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Jame Abraham; Electra D Paskett; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Kyle Porter; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12-23

7.  Cervical cancer worry and screening among appalachian women.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Nancy Schoenberg; Tomorrow D Wilson; Elvonna Atkins; Stephanie Dickinson; Electra Paskett
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2015-04

8.  What women with ovarian cancer think and know about genetic testing.

Authors:  Robin A Lacour; Molly S Daniels; Shannon N Westin; Larissa A Meyer; Catherine C Burke; Kimberly A Burns; Shiney Kurian; Nicki F Webb; Terri B Pustilnik; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Development of a Web-based Family Intervention for BRCA Carriers and Their Biological Relatives: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Miyeon Jung; Ann M Schafenacker; Kara J Milliron; Kari E Mendelsohn-Victor; Sofia D Merajver; Laurel L Northouse
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-04-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.