Literature DB >> 19291376

A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy.

Chris M R Smerecnik1, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries.   

Abstract

This review presents an overview of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy in papers published between January 2000 and February 2007. The results suggest that genetic counseling may have a positive impact on risk perception accuracy, though some studies observed no impact at all, or only for low-risk participants. Several implications for future research can be deduced. First, future researchers should link risk perception changes to objective risk estimates, define risk perception accuracy as the correct counseled risk estimate, and report both the proportion of individuals who correctly estimate their risk and the average overestimation of the risk. Second, as the descriptions of the counseling sessions were generally poor, future research should include more detailed description of these sessions and link their content to risk perception outcomes to allow interpretation of the results. Finally, the effect of genetic counseling should be examined for a wider variety of hereditary conditions. Genetic counselors should provide the necessary context in which counselees can understand risk information, use both verbal and numerical risk estimates to communicate personal risk information, and use visual aids when communicating numerical risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291376     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9210-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  42 in total

Review 1.  Research directions in genetic counselling: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Pilnick; R Dingwall
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-08

2.  Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  K Nordin; A Lidén; M Hansson; R Rosenquist; G Berglund
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Psychological responses to prenatal NTS counseling and the uptake of invasive testing in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Amy S Kaiser; Lorraine E Ferris; Randy Katz; Anne Pastuszak; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Jo-Ann Johnson; Brian F Shaw
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-07

5.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Tracy Waldeck; Gloria M Petersen; Diana Miglioretti; Jill D Trimbath; Miriam A Tillery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Effects of counseling Ashkenazi Jewish women about breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Wylie Burke; Julie O Culver; Nancy Press; Susan Crystal
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2006-01

8.  Educating women about breast cancer. An intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; June C Carroll; Ruth E Heisey; Vivek Goel; Wendy S Meschino; H Lavina A Lickley; Brian D Doan; Pamela L Chart; Vanessa Orr; Shelley Lothian
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Genetic counselling for cancer and risk perception.

Authors:  Annika Lidén; Gunilla Berglund; Mats G Hansson; Richard Rosenquist; P O Sjödén; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  47 in total

1.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Heather Niven; Alison Rutstein; Louisa Flander; Clara Gaff; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-14

3.  Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Margaux C Genoff; Melissa Salerno; Kimberly Amoroso; Sherry R Boyar; Margaret Sheehan; Megan Harlan Fleischut; Beth Siegel; Angela G Arnold; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

6.  Descriptive and numeric estimation of risk for psychotic disorders among affected individuals and relatives: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin; Catriona Hippman; William G Honer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Juliette Christie; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  An assessment of genetic counseling services for individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stephanie Skinner; Colleen Guimond; Rachel Butler; Emily Dwosh; Anthony L Traboulsee; A Dessa Sadovnick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.