Literature DB >> 24671341

Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk.

Kimberly M Kelly1, Lee Ellington, Nancy Schoenberg, Parul Agarwal, Thomas Jackson, Stephanie Dickinson, Jame Abraham, Electra D Paskett, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski.   

Abstract

Few studies have linked actual genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes. Using the Self-regulation Model, the impact of cognitive and affective content in genetic counseling on short-term outcomes was studied in individuals at elevated risk of familial breast-ovarian cancer. Surveys assessed dependent variables: distress, perceived risk, and 6 knowledge measures (Meaning of Positive Test; Meaning of Negative Test; Personal Behavior; Practitioner Knowledge; Mechanisms of Cancer Inheritance; Frequency of Inherited Cancer) measured at pre- and post-counseling. Proportion of participant cognitive and affective and counselor cognitive and affective content during sessions (using LIWC software) were predictors in regressions. Knowledge increased for 5 measures and decreased for Personal Behavior, Distress and Perceived Risk. Controlling for age and education, results were significant/marginally significant for three measures. More counselor content was associated with decreases in knowledge of Personal Behavior. More participant and less counselor affective content was associated with gains in Practitioner Knowledge. More counselor cognitive, and interaction of counselor cognitive and affective content, were associated with higher perceived risk. Genetic counselors dominate the content of counseling sessions. Therefore, their content is tied more closely to short term outcomes than participant content. A lack of patient communication in sessions may pose problems for understanding of complex concepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671341      PMCID: PMC4157074          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9705-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  59 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Kimberly M Kelly; Maija Reblin; Seth Latimer; Debra Roter
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Information seeking and intentions to have genetic testing for hereditary cancers in rural and Appalachian Kentuckians.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; James E Andrews; Donald O Case; Suzanne L Allard; J David Johnson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Tailoring communication in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  E A Lobb; P N Butow; B Meiser; A Barratt; C Gaff; M A Young; J Kirk; G K Suthers; K Tucker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Kyle Porter; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12-23

3.  Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Sarah H Davis; Jane H Lassetter; Neil E Peterson; Margaret F Clayton; Wendy C Birmingham; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-15

4.  Cancer Risk Information Sharing: The Experience of Individuals Receiving Genetic Counseling for BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Ishveen Chopra; Kimberly M Kelly
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-01-23

5.  The Impact of Genetic Counseling Educational Tools on Patients' Knowledge of Molecular Testing Terminology.

Authors:  Brianna A McDaniels; Rachel S Hianik; Cecelia Bellcross; Walid L Shaib; Jeffrey Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Jane L Meisel; Keerthi Gogineni; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Juliette Christie; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Scott Kelly; Rachel H Nusbaum; Morgan Similuk; Tiffani A DeMarco; Gillian W Hooker; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea D Forman; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Claire Davis; Shelley R McCormick; Wendy McKinnon; Kristi D Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Judy Garber; Marie Wood; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic counselor implicit bias and its effects on cognitive and affective exchanges in racially discordant simulations.

Authors:  Chenery L Lowe; Mary Catherine Beach; Debra L Roter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.