Literature DB >> 26141157

The Client's Perspective of Genetic Counseling-A Grounded Theory Study.

H Skirton1.   

Abstract

Previous studies of genetic counseling have mainly focused on outcomes defined by researchers or service providers, and have frequently related to changes in reproductive behavior and/or client knowledge. A longitudinal study of 43 families referred to a clinical genetic service was undertaken to ascertain client needs and expectations of the service, and to identify relevant outcomes from the clients' perspective. Semistructured interviews were conducted with each client, prior to and after genetic counseling. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using grounded theory. The need for certainty emerged as a powerful factor that motivated clients to pursue the genetic referral. The client's lay knowledge of the condition, satisfaction of the need for certainty, and the formation of a personalized relationship between the client and the genetics staff significantly influenced the central outcome, identified as a change in the client's psychological adaptation to the genetic condition in the family.

Year:  2001        PMID: 26141157     DOI: 10.1023/A:1016677110500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  21 in total

1.  Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sarah E Truesdell; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Attitudes of families to some aspects of Huntington's chorea.

Authors:  J Barette; C D Marsden
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Revealed identity: a study of the process of genetic counselling.

Authors:  D Armstrong; S Michie; T Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Genetic counseling: a consumers' view.

Authors:  C O Leonard; G A Chase; B Childs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.

Authors:  D M Webster; A W Kruglanski
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

6.  Family protectiveness: a response to ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  D M Tapp
Journal:  Can J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  1993

7.  Truth: treatment of choice, scarce resource, or patient's right?

Authors:  S Gadow
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1979

9.  Telling children about their impending death.

Authors:  E Purssell
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  1994 Feb 10-23

10.  The influence of genetic counselling in the era of DNA testing on knowledge, reproductive intentions and psychological wellbeing.

Authors:  R J Rona; R Beech; S Mandalia; D Donnai; H Kingston; R Harris; O Wilson; C Axtell; A V Swan; F Kavanagh
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Grounded theory in genetic counseling research: an interpretive perspective.

Authors:  Robin E Grubs; Maria Piantanida
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  What counts as effective genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing in late-onset disorders? A study of the consultand's perspective.

Authors:  Lídia Guimarães; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Complementarity between medical geneticists and genetic counsellors: its added value in genetic services in Europe.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Clara Serra-Juhé; Rebecka Pestoff; Christophe Cordier; João Silva; Ramona Moldovan; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Musings on genome medicine: the value of family history.

Authors:  Angus John Clarke
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.