| Literature DB >> 26133984 |
Zhenghua Zhou1, Qinqin Diao1, Nan Shao1, Youke Liang1, Li Lin1, Yan Lei1, Lingmei Zheng1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an analysis of the frequency of unhealthy food advertising on mainland Chinese television (TV) and children and adolescents' risk of exposure to them.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26133984 PMCID: PMC4489874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The ad frequency and proportion of diverse types of ads.
WFF, western fast food; FPG, food ads as a proportion of the gross ads; SPF, snack ads as a proportion of the food ads; SPG, snack ads as a proportion of the gross ads; WPF, western fast food ads as a proportion of the food ads; BPS, beverage ads as a proportion of the snack ads; RPS, SSRC ads as a proportion of the snack ads; MPS, SSMC ads as a proportion of the snack ads; LPS, SSLC ads as a proportion of the snack ads; SSRCs, snacks suitable for regular consumption; SSMCs, snacks suitable for moderate consumption; SSLCs, snacks suitable for limited consumption. The sample was 40 TV channels.
Ad frequencies of various food groups of snacks on TV channels*.
| Food groups | SSRC ads | SSMC ads | SSLC ads | Total |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median |
| Median |
| Median |
| Median |
| ||
| Sweet snacks | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 1 | 0–11 | 1 | 0–16 | 0.000 |
| Meat, seafood, and eggs | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–2 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–1 | 0.000 |
| Cereals | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–11 | 1 | 0–4 | 3 | 0–14 | 0.000 |
| Beans & products | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0.368 |
| Vegetable & fruit | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0.607 |
| Milk & products | 0 | 0–1 | 0 | 0–1 | 0 | 0–1 | 1 | 0–5 | 0.437 |
| Nuts & seeds | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0.368 |
| Tubers | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–3 | 0 | 0–4 | 0.000 |
| Beverages | 0 | 0–0 | 10 | 1–19 | 41 | 8–62 | 49 | 11–85 | 0.000 |
| Cold drinks | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0.050 |
| Total | 0 | 0–2 | 21 | 7–36 | 58 | 25–76 | 92 | 38–128 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||
SSRC, snack suitable for regular consumption; SSMC, snack suitable for moderate consumption; SSLC, snack suitable for limited consumption.
* The sample was 40 TV channels.
† P value for difference among food categories by Friedman test for several related samples.
‡ P value for difference among SSRC, SSMC, and SSLC ads by Friedman test for several related samples.
Fig 2The trends in ad frequency during the time intervals.
SSRCs, snacks suitable for regular consumption; SSMCs, snacks suitable for moderate consumption; SSLCs, snacks suitable for limited consumption. By Friedman test for several related samples, the difference was significant among time intervals in a day in gross ads (P = 0.000), food ads (P = 0.000), snack ads (P = 0.000), western fast food ads (P = 0.039), SSMC ads (P = 0.000), SSLC ads (P = 0.000), and beverage ads (P = 0.000). But the difference was not significant in SSRC ads (P = 0.275). The sample was 40 TV channels.