OBJECTIVE: To provide the most comprehensive analysis to date of the extent of food advertising on UK television channels popular with young people following regulatory reform of this type of marketing activity. METHODS: UK television was recorded 06:00-22:00 h for a weekday and a weekend day every month between January and December 2008 for 14 of the most popular commercial channels broadcasting children's/family viewing. Recordings were screened for advertisements, which were coded according to predefined categories including whether they were broadcast in peak/non-peak children's viewing time. Food advertisements were coded as core (healthy)/non-core (unhealthy)/miscellaneous foods. RESULTS: Food and drinks were the third most heavily advertised product category, and there were a significantly greater proportion of advertisements for food/drinks during peak compared to non-peak children's viewing times. A significantly greater proportion of the advertisements broadcast around soap operas than around children's programmes were for food/drinks. Children's channels broadcast a significantly greater proportion of non-core food advertisements than the family channels. There were significant differences between recording months for the proportion of core/non-core/miscellaneous food advertisements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite regulation, children in the UK are exposed to more TV advertising for unhealthy than healthy food items, even at peak children's viewing times. There remains scope to strengthen the rules regarding advertising of HFSS foods around programming popular with children and adults alike, where current regulations do not apply. Ongoing, systematic monitoring is essential for evaluation of the effectiveness of regulations designed to reduce children's exposure to HFSS food advertising on television in the UK.
OBJECTIVE: To provide the most comprehensive analysis to date of the extent of food advertising on UK television channels popular with young people following regulatory reform of this type of marketing activity. METHODS: UK television was recorded 06:00-22:00 h for a weekday and a weekend day every month between January and December 2008 for 14 of the most popular commercial channels broadcasting children's/family viewing. Recordings were screened for advertisements, which were coded according to predefined categories including whether they were broadcast in peak/non-peak children's viewing time. Food advertisements were coded as core (healthy)/non-core (unhealthy)/miscellaneous foods. RESULTS: Food and drinks were the third most heavily advertised product category, and there were a significantly greater proportion of advertisements for food/drinks during peak compared to non-peak children's viewing times. A significantly greater proportion of the advertisements broadcast around soap operas than around children's programmes were for food/drinks. Children's channels broadcast a significantly greater proportion of non-core food advertisements than the family channels. There were significant differences between recording months for the proportion of core/non-core/miscellaneous food advertisements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite regulation, children in the UK are exposed to more TV advertising for unhealthy than healthy food items, even at peak children's viewing times. There remains scope to strengthen the rules regarding advertising of HFSS foods around programming popular with children and adults alike, where current regulations do not apply. Ongoing, systematic monitoring is essential for evaluation of the effectiveness of regulations designed to reduce children's exposure to HFSS food advertising on television in the UK.
Authors: John E Blundell; Jennifer Lyn Baker; Emma Boyland; Ellen Blaak; Jadwiga Charzewska; Stefaan de Henauw; Gema Frühbeck; Marcela Gonzalez-Gross; Johannes Hebebrand; Lotte Holm; Vilma Kriaucioniene; Lauren Lissner; Jean-Michel Oppert; Karin Schindler; Ana Lúcia Silva; Euan Woodward Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: P Scarborough; C Payne; C G Agu; A Kaur; A Mizdrak; M Rayner; J C G Halford; E Boyland Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Teresa Correa; Marcela Reyes; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Camila Corvalán; Francesca R Dillman Carpentier Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 11.561
Authors: See H Ng; Bridget Kelly; Chee H Se; Karuthan Chinna; Mohd Jamil Sameeha; Shanthi Krishnasamy; M N Ismail; Tilakavati Karupaiah Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: L N Signal; J Stanley; M Smith; M B Barr; T J Chambers; J Zhou; A Duane; C Gurrin; A F Smeaton; C McKerchar; A L Pearson; J Hoek; G L S Jenkin; C Ni Mhurchu Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-10-08 Impact factor: 6.457