Literature DB >> 26127053

Effects of pulse duration on magnetostimulation thresholds.

Emine U Saritas1, Patrick W Goodwill2, Steven M Conolly3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medical imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic particle imaging (MPI) utilize time-varying magnetic fields that are subject to magnetostimulation limits, which often limit the speed of the imaging process. Various human-subject experiments have studied the amplitude and frequency dependence of these thresholds for gradient or homogeneous magnetic fields. Another contributing factor was shown to be number of cycles in a magnetic pulse, where the thresholds decreased with longer pulses. The latter result was demonstrated on two subjects only, at a single frequency of 1.27 kHz. Hence, whether the observed effect was due to the number of cycles or due to the pulse duration was not specified. In addition, a gradient-type field was utilized; hence, whether the same phenomenon applies to homogeneous magnetic fields remained unknown. Here, the authors investigate the pulse duration dependence of magnetostimulation limits for a 20-fold range of frequencies using homogeneous magnetic fields, such as the ones used for the drive field in MPI.
METHODS: Magnetostimulation thresholds were measured in the arms of six healthy subjects (age: 27 ± 5 yr). Each experiment comprised testing the thresholds at eight different pulse durations between 2 and 125 ms at a single frequency, which took approximately 30-40 min/subject. A total of 34 experiments were performed at three different frequencies: 1.2, 5.7, and 25.5 kHz. A solenoid coil providing homogeneous magnetic field was used to induce stimulation, and the field amplitude was measured in real time. A pre-emphasis based pulse shaping method was employed to accurately control the pulse durations. Subjects reported stimulation via a mouse click whenever they felt a twitching/tingling sensation. A sigmoid function was fitted to the subject responses to find the threshold at a specific frequency and duration, and the whole procedure was repeated at all relevant frequencies and pulse durations.
RESULTS: The magnetostimulation limits decreased with increasing pulse duration (T(pulse)). For T(pulse) < 18 ms, the thresholds were significantly higher than at the longest pulse durations (p < 0.01, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The normalized magnetostimulation threshold (B(Norm)) vs duration curve at all three frequencies agreed almost identically, indicating that the observed effect is independent of the operating frequency. At the shortest pulse duration (T(pulse) ≈ 2 ms), the thresholds were approximately 24% higher than at the asymptotes. The thresholds decreased to within 4% of their asymptotic values for T(pulse) > 20 ms. These trends were well characterized (R(2) = 0.78) by a stretched exponential function given by B(Norm)=1+αe(-T(pulse)/β(γ)) , where the fitted parameters were α = 0.44, β = 4.32, and γ = 0.60.
CONCLUSIONS: This work shows for the first time that the magnetostimulation thresholds decrease with increasing pulse duration, and that this effect is independent of the operating frequency. Normalized threshold vs duration trends are almost identical for a 20-fold range of frequencies: the thresholds are significantly higher at short pulse durations and settle to within 4% of their asymptotic values for durations longer than 20 ms. These results emphasize the importance of matching the human-subject experiments to the imaging conditions of a particular setup. Knowing the dependence of the safety limits to all contributing factors is critical for increasing the time-efficiency of imaging systems that utilize time-varying magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26127053      PMCID: PMC4441713          DOI: 10.1118/1.4921209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Simple anatomical measurements do not correlate significantly to individual peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds as measured in MRI gradient coils.

Authors:  Blaine A Chronik; Meena Ramachandran
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles.

Authors:  Bernhard Gleich; Jürgen Weizenecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients.

Authors:  T F Budinger; H Fischer; D Hentschel; H E Reinfelder; F Schmitt
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds.

Authors:  Irving N Weinberg; Pavel Y Stepanov; Stanley T Fricke; Roland Probst; Mario Urdaneta; Daniel Warnow; Howard Sanders; Steven C Glidden; Alan McMillan; Piotr M Starewicz; J Patrick Reilly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Maximum pulsed electromagnetic field limits based on peripheral nerve stimulation: application to IEEE/ANSI C95.1 electromagnetic field standards.

Authors:  J P Reilly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Magnetostimulation limits in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; George Z Zhang; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  The X-space formulation of the magnetic particle imaging process: 1-D signal, resolution, bandwidth, SNR, SAR, and magnetostimulation.

Authors:  Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Avoiding peripheral nerve stimulation: gradient waveform criteria for optimum resolution in echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  P R Harvey; P Mansfield
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  X-space MPI: magnetic nanoparticles for safe medical imaging.

Authors:  Patrick William Goodwill; Emine Ulku Saritas; Laura Rose Croft; Tyson N Kim; Kannan M Krishnan; David V Schaffer; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 10.  Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) for NMR and MRI researchers.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Laura R Croft; Justin J Konkle; Kuan Lu; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic Particle Imaging for Highly Sensitive, Quantitative, and Safe in Vivo Gut Bleed Detection in a Murine Model.

Authors:  Elaine Y Yu; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Ran Berzon; Zhi Wei Tay; Xinyi Y Zhou; Amit P Khandhar; R Matthew Ferguson; Scott J Kemp; Bo Zheng; Patrick W Goodwill; Michael F Wendland; Kannan M Krishnan; Spencer Behr; Jonathan Carter; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Validation of surface-to-volume ratio measurements derived from oscillating gradient spin echo on a clinical scanner using anisotropic fiber phantoms.

Authors:  Gregory Lemberskiy; Steven H Baete; Martijn A Cloos; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Seeing SPIOs Directly In Vivo with Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Bo Zheng; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Kuan Lu; Justin J Konkle; Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Xinyi Y Zhou; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; John D Hazle; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Multi-Channel Acquisition for Isotropic Resolution in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Kuan Lu; Patrick Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Steven Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  The Reconstruction of Magnetic Particle Imaging: Current Approaches Based on the System Matrix.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Zhenqi Jiang; Xiao Han; Xiaolin Wang; Xiaoying Tang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Towards Picogram Detection of Superparamagnetic Iron-Oxide Particles Using a Gradiometric Receive Coil.

Authors:  Matthias Graeser; Tobias Knopp; Patryk Szwargulski; Thomas Friedrich; Anselm von Gladiss; Michael Kaul; Kannan M Krishnan; Harald Ittrich; Gerhard Adam; Thorsten M Buzug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.