Literature DB >> 9444851

Maximum pulsed electromagnetic field limits based on peripheral nerve stimulation: application to IEEE/ANSI C95.1 electromagnetic field standards.

J P Reilly1.   

Abstract

This communication proposes a rationale for maximum pulsed magnetic field limits in the electromagnetic-field standards of IEEE/ANSI C95.1. The peak limits, intended to protect against peripheral nerve excitation by pulsed fields, are adapted from existing standards for patient exposure in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9444851     DOI： 10.1109/10.650371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN： 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds.

Authors:  Irving N Weinberg; Pavel Y Stepanov; Stanley T Fricke; Roland Probst; Mario Urdaneta; Daniel Warnow; Howard Sanders; Steven C Glidden; Alan McMillan; Piotr M Starewicz; J Patrick Reilly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effects of pulse duration on magnetostimulation thresholds.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Slew-rate dependence of tracer magnetization response in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Saqlain A Shah; R M Ferguson; K M Krishnan
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Lightweight, compact, and high-performance 3T MR system for imaging the brain and extremities.

Authors:  Thomas K F Foo; Evangelos Laskaris; Mark Vermilyea; Minfeng Xu; Paul Thompson; Gene Conte; Christopher Van Epps; Christopher Immer; Seung-Kyun Lee; Ek T Tan; Dominic Graziani; Jean-Baptise Mathieu; Christopher J Hardy; John F Schenck; Eric Fiveland; Wolfgang Stautner; Justin Ricci; Joseph Piel; Keith Park; Yihe Hua; Ye Bai; Alex Kagan; David Stanley; Paul T Weavers; Erin Gray; Yunhong Shu; Matthew A Frick; Norbert G Campeau; Joshua Trzasko; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS).

Authors:  Erica Kreisberg; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Niranjan Khadka; Abhishek Datta; Bashar W Badran; J Douglas Bremner; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Linearity and shift invariance for quantitative magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Kuan Lu; Patrick W Goodwill; Emine U Saritas; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A New Phased-Array Magnetic Resonance Imaging Receive-Only Coil for HBO2 Studies.

Authors:  Azma Mareyam; Erik Shank; Lawrence L Wald; Michael K Qin; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 3.847
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.