Literature DB >> 22559628

Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds.

Irving N Weinberg, Pavel Y Stepanov, Stanley T Fricke, Roland Probst, Mario Urdaneta, Daniel Warnow, Howard Sanders, Steven C Glidden, Alan McMillan, Piotr M Starewicz, J Patrick Reilly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A time-varying magnetic field can cause unpleasant peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) when the maximum excursion of the magnetic field (ΔB) is above a frequency-dependent threshold level [P. Mansfield and P. R. Harvey, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 746-758 (1993)]. Clinical and research magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gradient systems have been designed to avoid such bioeffects by adhering to regulations and guidelines established on the basis of clinical trials. Those trials, generally employing sinusoidal waveforms, tested human responses to magnetic fields at frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz [W. Irnich and F. Schmitt, Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 619-623 (1995), T. F. Budinger et al., J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15, 909-914 (1991), and D. J. Schaefer et al., J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 20-29 (2000)]. PNS thresholds for frequencies higher than 10 kHz had been extrapolated, using physiological models [J. P. Reilly et al., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-32(12), 1001-1011 (1985)]. The present study provides experimental data on human PNS thresholds to oscillating magnetic field stimulation from 2 to 183 kHz. Sinusoidal waveforms were employed for several reasons: (1) to facilitate comparison with earlier reports that used sine waves, (2) because prior designers of fast gradient hardware for generalized waveforms (e.g., including trapezoidal pulses) have employed quarter-sine-wave resonant circuits to reduce the rise- and fall-times of pulse waveforms, and (3) because sinusoids are often used in fast pulse sequences (e.g., spiral scans) [S. Nowak, U.S. patent 5,245,287 (14 September 1993) and K. F. King and D. J. Schaefer, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 164-170 (2000)].
METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective clinical trial was performed, involving 26 adults, in which one wrist was exposed to decaying sinusoidal magnetic field pulses at frequencies from 2 to 183 kHz and amplitudes up to 0.4 T. Sham exposures (i.e., with no magnetic fields) were applied to all subjects.
RESULTS: For 0.4 T pulses at 2, 25, 59, 101, and 183 kHz, stimulation was reported by 22 (84.6%), 24 (92.3%), 15 (57.7%), 2 (7.7%), and 1 (3.8%) subjects, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The probability of PNS due to brief biphasic time-varying sinusoidal magnetic fields with magnetic excursions up to 0.4 T is shown to decrease significantly at and above 101 kHz. This phenomenon may have particular uses in dynamic scenarios (e.g., cardiac imaging) and in studying processes with short decay times (e.g., electron paramagnetic resonance imaging, bone and solids imaging). The study suggests the possibility of new designs for human and preclinical MRI systems that may be useful in clinical practice and scientific research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559628      PMCID: PMC3344882          DOI: 10.1118/1.3702775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Spiral scan peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  K F King; D J Schaefer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields.

Authors:  D J Schaefer; J D Bourland; J A Nyenhuis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients.

Authors:  T F Budinger; H Fischer; D Hentschel; H E Reinfelder; F Schmitt
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve.

Authors:  D R McNeal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Magnetostimulation in MRI.

Authors:  W Irnich; F Schmitt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Maximum pulsed electromagnetic field limits based on peripheral nerve stimulation: application to IEEE/ANSI C95.1 electromagnetic field standards.

Authors:  J P Reilly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Limits to neural stimulation in echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  P Mansfield; P R Harvey
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Sensory effects of transient electrical stimulation--evaluation with a neuroelectric model.

Authors:  J P Reilly; V T Freeman; W D Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 9.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Local planar gradients with order-of-magnitude strength and speed advantage.

Authors:  Bulent Aksel; Luca Marinelli; Bruce D Collick; Cornelius Von Morze; Paul A Bottomley; Christopher J Hardy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.737

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of pulse duration on magnetostimulation thresholds.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Validation of surface-to-volume ratio measurements derived from oscillating gradient spin echo on a clinical scanner using anisotropic fiber phantoms.

Authors:  Gregory Lemberskiy; Steven H Baete; Martijn A Cloos; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  A silent gradient axis for soundless spatial encoding to enable fast and quiet brain imaging.

Authors:  Edwin Versteeg; Dennis W J Klomp; Jeroen C W Siero
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 4.  Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies.

Authors:  Jinbing Xie; Zheyu Shen; Yasutaka Anraku; Kazunori Kataoka; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

Review 6.  Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) for NMR and MRI researchers.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Laura R Croft; Justin J Konkle; Kuan Lu; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Open challenges in magnetic drug targeting.

Authors:  Benjamin Shapiro; Sandip Kulkarni; Aleksander Nacev; Silvia Muro; Pavel Y Stepanov; Irving N Weinberg
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2014-11-06

8.  Dynamic inversion enables external magnets to concentrate ferromagnetic rods to a central target.

Authors:  A Nacev; I N Weinberg; P Y Stepanov; S Kupfer; L O Mair; M G Urdaneta; M Shimoji; S T Fricke; B Shapiro
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Magnetic Microdevices for MRI-Based Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Viruses.

Authors:  Lamar O Mair; Olivia Hale; Sahar Jafari; Cheng Chen; Oleg Udalov; Roland Probst; Ittai Baum; Anjana Hevaganinge; Elaine Yi Wang; Olga C Rodriguez; Christopher Albanese; Stanley T Fricke; Irving N Weinberg
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-24

10.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Magnetic Particle Imaging for Electromagnetic Navigation in Targeted Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Tuan-Anh Le; Xingming Zhang; Ali Kafash Hoshiar; Jungwon Yoon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.